Kaarel Velgre - Prescreening / Editing advice

[KaarelVelgre]

1-4. horizon (CW)

Okay, I tried to fix the hoirizon, hope they're all right now:




Best regards!

[dlowwa]

Hi! Can I get these photos prescreened, please:

1-4. horizon (CW)
5. contrast, borderline soft

[KaarelVelgre]

Hi! Can I get these photos prescreened, please:





I'm sorry if i'm asking too much prescreening, I just need a little more experience, and then i'll be able
to determine myself, if the photo is acceptable or no. But thank you guys, what you have done so far!
It's a huge help to me
Best regards, Kaarel

[Julian S.]

Okay, thanks! Is the sharpness okay now?

Would be okay for me, yes.

[KaarelVelgre]

This is a military aircraft.

Okay, thanks! Is the sharpness okay now?

[dlowwa]

Yes, it is always at 100. Probably there is something wrong with my editing then, will try to fix this.



I have one more question: around hour or two ago, I got one photo rejected for undersharpening and bad info. I understand the undersharpening, but i do not understand, what's wrong with the info there: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10087260 Does it need some special boxes selected?
I tried to fix the sharpness, can you take a quick look at it:

This is a military aircraft.

[KaarelVelgre]

Basically yes, have you saved you Image in the highest quality? If not, that could solve the problem.
If the artefacts are still there, it could have something to do with your workflow. For example overuse of noise reduction or sharpen programs which cause similar effects to compression artefacts.

Yes, it is always at 100. Probably there is something wrong with my editing then, will try to fix this.



I have one more question: around hour or two ago, I got one photo rejected for undersharpening and bad info. I understand the undersharpening, but i do not understand, what's wrong with the info there: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10087260 Does it need some special boxes selected?
I tried to fix the sharpness, can you take a quick look at it:

[Julian S.]

Okay, thanks!
So basically the photo of UK government would be fixable, if the compression artefacts are fixable?
And yeah, of course I have a photo of LOT E190 taken from the same angle but without the antenna obstructing. I didn't even notice it until you mentioned it

Basically yes, have you saved you Image in the highest quality? If not, that could solve the problem.
If the artefacts are still there, it could have something to do with your workflow. For example overuse of noise reduction or sharpen programs which cause similar effects to compression artefacts.

[KaarelVelgre]

No problem.

Harsh Contrast means that the contrast is too strong - the lights are too bright and the shadows too dark.
5th Photo is likely to be rejected, as such an obstruction can be easily avoided. So if you have a picture taken a second earlier or later, where the antenna isn't sticking in the aircraft it would be fine. Night shot because of the low sun as well as special scheme category is necessary here please.

Okay, thanks!
So basically the photo of UK government would be fixable, if the compression artefacts are fixable?
And yeah, of course I have a photo of LOT E190 taken from the same angle but without the antenna obstructing. I didn't even notice it until you mentioned it

[Julian S.]

No problem.

Harsh Contrast means that the contrast is too strong - the lights are too bright and the shadows too dark.
5th Photo is likely to be rejected, as such an obstruction can be easily avoided. So if you have a picture taken a second earlier or later, where the antenna isn't sticking in the aircraft it would be fine. Night shot because of the low sun as well as special scheme category is necessary here please.

[KaarelVelgre]

1 is a bit overexposed i feel, contrast is also a bit harsh
2 is overexposed, but otherwise okay
3 should be okay
4 as slight compression artefacts and the darks are too dark (harsh contrast)
5 is obstructed due to the antenna which is infront of the engine, therwise its okay

Don't forget to tick the correct categories if uploading.

Thanks a lot!
What does harsh contrast mean? I still haven't understand it
And, is 5th photo acceptable with this kind of obstruction, or it will be rejected?
And does it need Night Shot marking?

[Julian S.]

1 is a bit overexposed i feel, contrast is also a bit harsh
2 is overexposed, but otherwise okay
3 should be okay
4 as slight compression artefacts and the darks are too dark (harsh contrast)
5 is obstructed due to the antenna which is infront of the engine, therwise its okay

Don't forget to tick the correct categories if uploading.

[KaarelVelgre]

Hi, can i get these photos prescreened please:
1)

2)

3)

4)

5)


Thank you very much!

[dlowwa]

Thanks! Otherwise would be okay?

For me, yes.

[KaarelVelgre]

Borderline overexposed.

Thanks! Otherwise would be okay?