Arseni Kalbin - prescreening request / editing advice

[arseni628]

Horizon looks fine to me.

Yeah that's why I don't understand why it was rejected. Can you accept it please or what do I need to do?

[dlowwa]

Good day! I recently got a rejection for Horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10335333. I don't quite understand what's wrong with the horizon. I checked the hangar lines with Horizon tool and they are completely straight. Even when you just see the photo it doesn't lean anywhere. I know you don't like when I add someone's photos because screeners do mistakes and won't repeat them. But I use it as a clear example: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10610544. This photo is leveled much more roughly than mine. Thanks in advance and best regards.

Horizon looks fine to me.

[arseni628]

Ah, I don't know what's wrong with these lampposts, but they are always leaning somewhere at Tallinn. And local spotters level the horizon ONLY by these hangars.

[MarkLawrence]

I am not a screener, but I tend to agree with you on the buildings - the verticals and horizontals there seem good. I think it is that one lamppost in the middle of the image that really just leans to the right and gives the proportion of the image "leaning" to the right .. be interesting to see a screeners comments on this.

[arseni628]

Good day! I recently got a rejection for Horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10335333. I don't quite understand what's wrong with the horizon. I checked the hangar lines with Horizon tool and they are completely straight. Even when you just see the photo it doesn't lean anywhere. I know you don't like when I add someone's photos because screeners do mistakes and won't repeat them. But I use it as a clear example: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10610544. This photo is leveled much more roughly than mine. Thanks in advance and best regards.

[arseni628]

Tolerated if their effects are not noticeable. If they are noticeable, then usually an overprocessed rejection will result.

Thank you, just asking because without them my photo looks over-saturated, but if I adjust them (reduce), the photo looks way more natural.

[dlowwa]

Okay, thanks, another question, no idea if it is related to this topic, but is adjusting vibrance/saturation sliders tolerated at JP? Thanks.

Tolerated if their effects are not noticeable. If they are noticeable, then usually an overprocessed rejection will result.

[arseni628]

Okay, thanks, another question, no idea if it is related to this topic, but is adjusting vibrance/saturation sliders tolerated at JP? Thanks.

[pdeboer]

This was taken in overcast conditions. Could you please give some advice? Thanks.

Looks like a contrast problem (a/c is not well lit)

[arseni628]

This was taken in overcast conditions. Could you please give some advice? Thanks.

[dlowwa]

Can anyone please reply?

You can repost your request if you would like.

[arseni628]

Can anyone please reply?

[arseni628]

?

[arseni628]

Okay, sorry, now I read the whole post, so, let these photos be separated into two days, first 5 from today, and 3 from tomorrow, so I will not post any requests tomorrow.

[dlowwa]

Continuation of the previous post

Will ask you one more time to please read here CAREFULLY, especially #3:

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...ning-from-crew