Arseni Kalbin - prescreening request / editing advice

[arseni628]

Okay, thank you! But it wasn't so warm (18sep) when I took 2nd photo that even in 1280px it's still heat hazed. It often happens, some kind of a jpg thing. But those wavy lines just can't be caused by heat haze. I have other photos of small biz jets taken in July, with much more heat haze, but there weren't any waves.

[dlowwa]

Thanks! Are they any better? (Added two more pics)

1. ok for me
2. borderline heat haze
3. borderline heat haze/contrast
4. borderline heat haze
5. ok for m

[arseni628]

But it was taken with almost the same landing.

angle*

[arseni628]

And won't ZM405 be rejected for Similar photo? Because I already have a photo of it but in landing phase. I recently got rejected a photo for Similar, one was in landing phase, second (rejected one) in takeoff phase. But it was taken with almost the same landing. Links: 1)https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10661530 2)https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10628443 . In ZM405 case already uploaded photo (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10613438) was taken with a completely different angle. Second one is cooler imo so I wanted to have it too in the database.

Thanks and best regards.

[arseni628]

Thanks! Are they any better? (Added two more pics)

Thanks and best regards.

[dlowwa]

I tried to increase the exposure and lower resolution. Is it any better? And I'd like to pre-screen 4 more photos. Hope they aren't hazy

Thanks and best regards, Arseni.

1. ok for me
2-3. borderline heat haze
4. heat haze, overexposed
5. borderline overexposed

[arseni628]

I tried to increase the exposure and lower resolution. Is it any better? And I'd like to pre-screen 4 more photos. Hope they aren't hazy

Thanks and best regards, Arseni.

[arseni628]

Also poor contrast due to overcast/hazy conditions.

Thank you!

[dlowwa]

Okay, thank you, so as I understood, second one is unfixable. But the first one needs more contrast, right?

Also poor contrast due to overcast/hazy conditions.

[arseni628]

Massive amounts of heat haze visible on the first. Overall exposure ok I agree; this would have been better as a contrast rejection. I would hardly call the second a sunny day, there is obvious some clouds/haze badly affecting the quality of light.

Okay, thank you, so as I understood, second one is unfixable. But the first one needs more contrast, right?

[dlowwa]

Good day dear Jetphotos users and screeners. I recently got 2 rejects, but I'm not sure if the reasons are correct. I actually think screener has made a little mistake.

1) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10615653

2) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10615645

First was rejected for Underexposed and Heat distortion. Underexposed? Why? The aircraft is correctly exposed and the histogram is all good. I can barely see any heat distortion. If it even would be on the photo, it is borderline.

Second one was rejected for Underexposed and Tm or tl contrast. The photo was taken on a sunny day with good contrast and lighting. Aircraft is correctly exposed, and contrast is enough. Histogram says the same.

Massive amounts of heat haze visible on the first. Overall exposure ok I agree; this would have been better as a contrast rejection. I would hardly call the second a sunny day, there is obvious some clouds/haze badly affecting the quality of light.

[MarkLawrence]

Again, noting I am not a screener, but my best guess - this is the first one - this is the histogram for that and you can see on the right hand side, it is underexposed - there is a big gap.



This is the second histogram - again, there is a gap on the right hand side and that would be my guess to the underexposed. To me, the light looks very diffused and so that I would say is what is causing the contrast rejection.



HTH

[arseni628]

I am not a screener, but per the outline in the attachment, I see heat distortion along the top of the fuselage - the way I see it is that it looks like there are small waves in the top of the fuselage when looking at it compared the to the background sky. Just my opinion ..

Yes, I can see some heat distortion. That is pretty logical. But what about other reasons? I completely don't understand.

Thanks and best regards, Arseni.

[MarkLawrence]

1) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10615653

I am not a screener, but per the outline in the attachment, I see heat distortion along the top of the fuselage - the way I see it is that it looks like there are small waves in the top of the fuselage when looking at it compared the to the background sky. Just my opinion ..

[arseni628]

Good day dear Jetphotos users and screeners. I recently got 2 rejects, but I'm not sure if the reasons are correct. I actually think screener has made a little mistake.

1) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10615653

2) https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10615645

First was rejected for Underexposed and Heat distortion. Underexposed? Why? The aircraft is correctly exposed and the histogram is all good. I can barely see any heat distortion. If it even would be on the photo, it is borderline.

Second one was rejected for Underexposed and Tm or tl contrast. The photo was taken on a sunny day with good contrast and lighting. Aircraft is correctly exposed, and contrast is enough. Histogram says the same.

Thank you and best regards, Arseni.