Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Arseni Kalbin - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by arseni628 View Post
    Good day! Which categories/ticks should apply to these photos? Thanks.
    Business Jet/Small Prop/Cargo

    https://forums.jetphotos.com/showthr...ES-New-version

    Leave a comment:


  • arseni628
    replied
    Good day! Which categories/ticks should apply to these photos? Thanks.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • B7772ADL
    replied
    Hello, that is easily recognisable as a bird so absolutely fine to leave it there. We incidently do have some shots in the database where birds are obstructing but where it becomes part of a motive eg a large flock of birds flying close to an aircraft where it could become a potential hazard.

    Leave a comment:


  • JuklicekCZ
    replied
    I don't see any bird obstructing the aircraft.
    I would say, that birds are ok unless they are small enough to not be distinguishable from dust spots.
    But would have personally removed it unless they are part of the motive(forexample a floct of bids crossing the A/Cs path)

    Leave a comment:


  • arseni628
    replied
    Good day! Want to ask, are birds acceptable on the photo when they are not obstructing the aircraft? Here I'll attach my photo as an example. Sorry for adding the link, it doesn't let me upload a photo for some reason. Thanks and best regards.

    https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10409285

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by arseni628 View Post

    Yeah that's why I don't understand why it was rejected. Can you accept it please or what do I need to do?
    You can appeal if you feel strongly enough about it, but that process would be independent of my own opinion.

    Leave a comment:


  • arseni628
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Horizon looks fine to me.
    Yeah that's why I don't understand why it was rejected. Can you accept it please or what do I need to do?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by arseni628 View Post
    Good day! I recently got a rejection for Horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10335333. I don't quite understand what's wrong with the horizon. I checked the hangar lines with Horizon tool and they are completely straight. Even when you just see the photo it doesn't lean anywhere. I know you don't like when I add someone's photos because screeners do mistakes and won't repeat them. But I use it as a clear example: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10610544. This photo is leveled much more roughly than mine. Thanks in advance and best regards.
    Horizon looks fine to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • arseni628
    replied
    Ah, I don't know what's wrong with these lampposts, but they are always leaning somewhere at Tallinn. And local spotters level the horizon ONLY by these hangars.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarkLawrence
    replied
    I am not a screener, but I tend to agree with you on the buildings - the verticals and horizontals there seem good. I think it is that one lamppost in the middle of the image that really just leans to the right and gives the proportion of the image "leaning" to the right .. be interesting to see a screeners comments on this.

    Leave a comment:


  • arseni628
    replied
    Good day! I recently got a rejection for Horizon unlevel. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10335333. I don't quite understand what's wrong with the horizon. I checked the hangar lines with Horizon tool and they are completely straight. Even when you just see the photo it doesn't lean anywhere. I know you don't like when I add someone's photos because screeners do mistakes and won't repeat them. But I use it as a clear example: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10610544. This photo is leveled much more roughly than mine. Thanks in advance and best regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • arseni628
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Tolerated if their effects are not noticeable. If they are noticeable, then usually an overprocessed rejection will result.
    Thank you, just asking because without them my photo looks over-saturated, but if I adjust them (reduce), the photo looks way more natural.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by arseni628 View Post
    Okay, thanks, another question, no idea if it is related to this topic, but is adjusting vibrance/saturation sliders tolerated at JP? Thanks.
    Tolerated if their effects are not noticeable. If they are noticeable, then usually an overprocessed rejection will result.

    Leave a comment:


  • arseni628
    replied
    Okay, thanks, another question, no idea if it is related to this topic, but is adjusting vibrance/saturation sliders tolerated at JP? Thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • pdeboer
    replied
    Originally posted by arseni628 View Post
    This was taken in overcast conditions. Could you please give some advice? Thanks.
    Looks like a contrast problem (a/c is not well lit)

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X