If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hey, I got rejected on this one and the reason is not centered. I am so confused about why I got this rejection reason. I check the "center" section, and the fuselage stays in the middle third of the picture. Does the "center" mean that it is better for the line around windows to stay at the center point? https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10109529
Not a screener, but if you uploaded the photo in this format, the plane is indeed high in frame. I would had put the center point slightly higher, close to the edge of the second flap fairing (I hope the explanetion of that part is correct...). Some time ago there was an explanation about correct centering in this forum (sorry, just cant find it).
Hey, I got rejected on this one and the reason is not centered. I am so confused about why I got this rejection reason. I check the "center" section, and the fuselage stays in the middle third of the picture. Does the "center" mean that it is better for the line around windows to stay at the center point?
Aircraft is indeed a little too high in the frame. Generally center of the fuselage should be used, as the window line can change depending on the angle.
I got rejected on this one for the reason of "soft". Of course, I did some edits on this one to try to avoid soft but it seems the edit I did is not enough. Does anyone know how to identify whether the photo is soft or not? In another word, how I can know that the photo I edit is acceptable?
I got rejected on this one for the reason of "soft". Of course, I did some edits on this one to try to avoid soft but it seems the edit I did is not enough. Does anyone know how to identify whether the photo is soft or not? In another word, how I can know that the photo I edit is acceptable?
Fine details should be well delineated (easy to see clear lines). This image is not too bad, but is a bit soft towards the front. This is not unusual due to a combination of depth of field and motion of the subject.
Can this one be accepted? If not, could someone give me tips to edit photos that are cloudy in the background so that can avoid the rejection reason "contract"?
Can this one be accepted? If not, could someone give me tips to edit photos that are cloudy in the background so that can avoid the rejection reason "contract"?
Not a screener, but looks a bit dark. I would probably increase the exposure and shadows a tiny bit. Contrast looks fine to me.
Can this one be accepted? If not, could someone give me tips to edit photos that are cloudy in the background so that can avoid the rejection reason "contract"?
Contrast is very harsh here, not because of the clouds but because of the angle of the sun. Pick a better time of day (lower sun, better direction), and you will see better results.
Contrast is very harsh here, not because of the clouds but because of the angle of the sun. Pick a better time of day (lower sun, better direction), and you will see better results.
Bad idea. Increasing the exposure will only blow out the highlights and make the contrast even worse.
Better idea. I knew the lighting looked off but yeah, I guess it is the angle of the sun.
Contrast is very harsh here, not because of the clouds but because of the angle of the sun. Pick a better time of day (lower sun, better direction), and you will see better results.
Bad idea. Increasing the exposure will only blow out the highlights and make the contrast even worse.
Thanks for your response. Do you mean if I want to photos with clouds, time with the lower sun will be better and it is worse to shoot at mid-day?
I am not a screener but I would say you are going to get a contrast rejection on this and probably dark too because there is no direct sunlight on the aircraft. If all of the images have the same light, then yes, I would say you are going to have problems with them too.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment