Originally posted by thebigdog360
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
thebigdog360 - Prescreening Advice
Collapse
X
-
-
For the first photo, would cropping out the tail and centering the fuselage in the middle of the screen be better? Or still up to screeners discretion like the current crop?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by thebigdog360 View PostPre-screening for these photos:
Multiple of these are kind of heavy crops in the frame, due to taking a zoomed out picture to get around the chain link fence. There are also some of these where the fuselage is on the bottom of the frame, and the tail stretching to the top. This was the only way I could get the aircraft in frame, unless it is acceptable to cut off the tail? But I wasn't sure on this, your opinion would be appreciated. Again, other pre-screening comments welcome. Thanks.
2. contrast, borderline cut off
3. borderline overexposed
4. borderline soft
5. ok for me
Leave a comment:
-
Pre-screening for these photos:
Multiple of these are kind of heavy crops in the frame, due to taking a zoomed out picture to get around the chain link fence. There are also some of these where the fuselage is on the bottom of the frame, and the tail stretching to the top. This was the only way I could get the aircraft in frame, unless it is acceptable to cut off the tail? But I wasn't sure on this, your opinion would be appreciated. Again, other pre-screening comments welcome. Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Originally posted by thebigdog360 View PostPre-screening please! I don't know if this would be too high in frame, it is centred based off of the main fuselage with the tail section ignored, which is usually what I would do. Just unsure because of the forward tilt. Also any other problems, thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by thebigdog360 View PostAdded some contrast in case it is fixable, but I can see that it may still be too little. Also, the water bomber was rejected for having vignette, which I do not understand at all. I have attached the equalized view and the only possible reason I can see is a large part of the top right corner, and some of the left side is darker. This is obviously just a part of the smoky sky that is darker, as the tail and building to the right are not darker, only the sky is. Would you say that I should appeal? Thank you.
2. as I said, would have been ok for me, but couldn't guarantee a successful appeal
Leave a comment:
-
Added some contrast in case it is fixable, but I can see that it may still be too little. Also, the water bomber was rejected for having vignette, which I do not understand at all. I have attached the equalized view and the only possible reason I can see is a large part of the top right corner, and some of the left side is darker. This is obviously just a part of the smoky sky that is darker, as the tail and building to the right are not darker, only the sky is. Would you say that I should appeal? Thank you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by thebigdog360 View PostAnother two I'm requesting pre-screening for:
The Falcon, though it may look like it was taken on an overcast day, it was actually a blue sky day. There is just smoke in the distance, and the sun had a cirrus cloud over it. Is this still going to have contrast problems or is this ok? For the water bomber, softness and horizon. Thanks.
2. ok for me
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: