Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

thebigdog360 - Prescreening Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by thebigdog360 View Post
    For the first photo, would cropping out the tail and centering the fuselage in the middle of the screen be better? Or still up to screeners discretion like the current crop?
    Better not to cut the tail. L-R centering is off, aircraft is a bit to the right of center.

    Leave a comment:


  • thebigdog360
    replied
    For the first photo, would cropping out the tail and centering the fuselage in the middle of the screen be better? Or still up to screeners discretion like the current crop?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by thebigdog360 View Post
    Pre-screening for these photos:
    Multiple of these are kind of heavy crops in the frame, due to taking a zoomed out picture to get around the chain link fence. There are also some of these where the fuselage is on the bottom of the frame, and the tail stretching to the top. This was the only way I could get the aircraft in frame, unless it is acceptable to cut off the tail? But I wasn't sure on this, your opinion would be appreciated. Again, other pre-screening comments welcome. Thanks.
    1. borderline centering
    2. contrast, borderline cut off
    3. borderline overexposed
    4. borderline soft
    5. ok for me

    Leave a comment:


  • thebigdog360
    replied
    Pre-screening for these photos:
    Multiple of these are kind of heavy crops in the frame, due to taking a zoomed out picture to get around the chain link fence. There are also some of these where the fuselage is on the bottom of the frame, and the tail stretching to the top. This was the only way I could get the aircraft in frame, unless it is acceptable to cut off the tail? But I wasn't sure on this, your opinion would be appreciated. Again, other pre-screening comments welcome. Thanks.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by thebigdog360 View Post
    Did not catch that dust spot, here it should be gone and with a tad more sharp.
    Still borderline, but ok for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • thebigdog360
    replied
    Did not catch that dust spot, here it should be gone and with a tad more sharp.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by thebigdog360 View Post
    Pre-screening please! I don't know if this would be too high in frame, it is centred based off of the main fuselage with the tail section ignored, which is usually what I would do. Just unsure because of the forward tilt. Also any other problems, thanks.
    Dirty, borderline soft. Centering ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • thebigdog360
    replied
    Pre-screening please! I don't know if this would be too high in frame, it is centred based off of the main fuselage with the tail section ignored, which is usually what I would do. Just unsure because of the forward tilt. Also any other problems, thanks.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by thebigdog360 View Post
    Here is another frame that I think was a little bit sharper to begin with, how is it now? I am aware neither of these are perfectly sharp. Thanks.
    Borderline at best. Not sure if it's just your editing or DOF issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • thebigdog360
    replied
    Here is another frame that I think was a little bit sharper to begin with, how is it now? I am aware neither of these are perfectly sharp. Thanks.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by thebigdog360 View Post
    Just want to confirm the horizon is good with this one, since it was taken with a wide angle. Also the nose seems a bit soft, what do you think?
    Horizon ok, but image is soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • thebigdog360
    replied
    Just want to confirm the horizon is good with this one, since it was taken with a wide angle. Also the nose seems a bit soft, what do you think?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by thebigdog360 View Post
    Added some contrast in case it is fixable, but I can see that it may still be too little. Also, the water bomber was rejected for having vignette, which I do not understand at all. I have attached the equalized view and the only possible reason I can see is a large part of the top right corner, and some of the left side is darker. This is obviously just a part of the smoky sky that is darker, as the tail and building to the right are not darker, only the sky is. Would you say that I should appeal? Thank you.
    1. still borderline at best
    2. as I said, would have been ok for me, but couldn't guarantee a successful appeal

    Leave a comment:


  • thebigdog360
    replied
    Added some contrast in case it is fixable, but I can see that it may still be too little. Also, the water bomber was rejected for having vignette, which I do not understand at all. I have attached the equalized view and the only possible reason I can see is a large part of the top right corner, and some of the left side is darker. This is obviously just a part of the smoky sky that is darker, as the tail and building to the right are not darker, only the sky is. Would you say that I should appeal? Thank you.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by thebigdog360 View Post
    Another two I'm requesting pre-screening for:

    The Falcon, though it may look like it was taken on an overcast day, it was actually a blue sky day. There is just smoke in the distance, and the sun had a cirrus cloud over it. Is this still going to have contrast problems or is this ok? For the water bomber, softness and horizon. Thanks.
    1. contrast
    2. ok for me

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X