Another two I'm requesting pre-screening for:
The Falcon, though it may look like it was taken on an overcast day, it was actually a blue sky day. There is just smoke in the distance, and the sun had a cirrus cloud over it. Is this still going to have contrast problems or is this ok? For the water bomber, softness and horizon. Thanks.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
thebigdog360 - Prescreening Advice
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by thebigdog360 View PostWould the foreground wing be enough to make the photo not suitable for the database, or is it just borderline? Also would the photo being hot have any impact on this? Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
Would the foreground wing be enough to make the photo not suitable for the database, or is it just borderline? Also would the photo being hot have any impact on this? Thanks.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by thebigdog360 View PostI went back for another round with this one just to see if I could get something better. There is no fence, but I am still worried about sharpness as the wind was pushing me around quite a bit. Also curious regarding contrast, as there was a large amount of wildfire smoke the day this photo was taken. I know this is the same stuff I have been asking for all these times, but could I get an opinion on horizon again? When I line up with the hangar, the aircraft looks very tilted, so I tried to find a middle ground. Thanks for all your help.
Leave a comment:
-
I went back for another round with this one just to see if I could get something better. There is no fence, but I am still worried about sharpness as the wind was pushing me around quite a bit. Also curious regarding contrast, as there was a large amount of wildfire smoke the day this photo was taken. I know this is the same stuff I have been asking for all these times, but could I get an opinion on horizon again? When I line up with the hangar, the aircraft looks very tilted, so I tried to find a middle ground. Thanks for all your help.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by thebigdog360 View PostWent snooping around the airport today with some spare time, unfortunately the weather was overcast so not very many useable photos. The first photo was in a spot of sunshine, so just wanted to make sure that this has enough contrast even though sky is overcast. Second photo, I didn't really think there was a chance with and only attempted an edit because the airframe is new to the database. All in all, curious on contrast, softness, and horizon mainly for these two. Thank you!
2. bad contrast. not fixable.
Leave a comment:
-
Went snooping around the airport today with some spare time, unfortunately the weather was overcast so not very many useable photos. The first photo was in a spot of sunshine, so just wanted to make sure that this has enough contrast even though sky is overcast. Second photo, I didn't really think there was a chance with and only attempted an edit because the airframe is new to the database. All in all, curious on contrast, softness, and horizon mainly for these two. Thank you!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by thebigdog360 View Post
Alright, I had some trouble with his horizon for some reason, but I believe that I have found a level that is acceptable. I have also noticed that many of my photos recently have had softness as a major issue, which I don't recall getting as much in the past. I will try to look into this. Here is even more sharpening, though I am worried there could be issues with graininess/oversharpened. Finally, not sure that this is the place to ask, but would this be considered a night shot being taken with the sun so low? Thanks for your help.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Don't one crop being significantly better than the other; both would be borderline (at screener's discretion). Newer version still a bit soft and probably needing a touch of CW rotation.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Don't one crop being significantly better than the other; both would be borderline (at screener's discretion). Newer version still a bit soft and probably needing a touch of CW rotation.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by thebigdog360 View Post
I have changed the crop a little bit to fully include the titles, I realize you said the other crop was still acceptable but would this be better? I wasn't sure if landing gear being cut off a little bit could affect it. Also rotated and sharpened more, how is it now?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
Crop slightly awkward, but might be acceptable. Soft, and needs a little CW rotation.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by thebigdog360 View Post
Ok that is understandable. Usually I would go over the fence but then the aircraft would be blocked by the scimitar on the other 737. Here is a different angle that doesn't have the fence in it, but I wasn't sure if this type of crop is acceptable on JetPhotos? If it isn't, what elements should be included something like this could be acceptable? Also my other questions from earlier like is softness and horizon ok for this one as well? Thank you!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
The fence would definitely be an issue, and there is not really any way to work around it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by thebigdog360 View PostAsking for a prescreen on this one please. There are a few concerns I have, mainly the fact that I was shooting through a fence, so you can see that in all the corners. Is that acceptable? Or could be confused with vignette? Also my shadow on the apron, softness, as well as horizon. I do have some different angles that could remedy the issue, but this is what I feel would be best. Finally, any other input for this one would be great. Thanks in advance!
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: