thebigdog360 - Prescreening Advice

[dlowwa]

Thank you, I know you are not a screener but I have made some adjustments based on your feedback:

All images slightly soft and show editing halos to various extents (overprocessed).

Also have this, which I am less confident in, but would coincidentally be new to the database .

Soft, blurry, too low, overprocessed.

[thebigdog360]

Also have this, which I am less confident in, but would coincidentally be new to the database .

[AKH]

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by FACO not being active? All the photos in the database show FACO as being a CN560 since the very first photo, and I am no expert in private jets, but the FACO I photographed does seem to be a CN560 as well?

You are right...ignore my comment regarding C-FACO...need glasses

[thebigdog360]

Not a screener, but
All 3 soft
1 borderline noisy
2 aircraft not centered (too low)

Thank you, I know you are not a screener but I have made some adjustments based on your feedback:

[thebigdog360]

I mean to tick the "HOT" box when uploading. So N443QS would qualify and also C-GSAT for sure. I still woudl doubt C-FACO since this particular aircraft is no longer active as such.
However, my point of view, the screeners will always decide if HOT or not.

I'm not sure I understand what you mean by FACO not being active? All the photos in the database show FACO as being a CN560 since the very first photo, and I am no expert in private jets, but the FACO I photographed does seem to be a CN560 as well?

[thebigdog360]

As N443QS registration is not in the DB, it is definitely hot, the hot text field should not even be filled as such a shot is hot automatically, regardless of whether the airframe is 1 year old, or 20.
This C-FACO livery is also not present yet, so it most likely is hot either.

Yes I was basing the claims of these being hot off of these points as well as what AKH mentioned about C-GSAT in an earlier reply.

[AKH]

As N443QS registration is not in the DB, it is definitely hot, the hot text field should not even be filled as such a shot is hot automatically, regardless of whether the airframe is 1 year old, or 20.
This C-FACO livery is also not present yet, so it most likely is hot either.

I mean to tick the "HOT" box when uploading. So N443QS would qualify and also C-GSAT for sure. I still woudl doubt C-FACO since this particular aircraft is no longer active as such.
However, my point of view, the screeners will always decide if HOT or not.

[JuklicekCZ]

Copy of my reply in your previous post.

Not a screener, but I would have doubts about the mentioned HOT status.
- N443QS would be a first registration in database (but the airframe is from 2021).
- C-FACO is an older CN550 and there are many photos in the database, except for this c/s. As far as I can see, C-FACO is currently assigned to a CN560.
- C-GSAT would be indeed new, as the reg was an Air Transat A310 before. So you may give priority to this photo in order to keep the HOT criteria.
My 5 cents.
Regards AKH

As N443QS registration is not in the DB, it is definitely hot, the hot text field should not even be filled as such a shot is hot automatically, regardless of whether the airframe is 1 year old, or 20.
This C-FACO livery is also not present yet, so it most likely is hot either.

[AKH]

Copy of my reply in your previous post.

Not a screener, but I would have doubts about the mentioned HOT status.
- N443QS would be a first registration in database (but the airframe is from 2021).
- C-FACO is an older CN550 and there are many photos in the database, except for this c/s. As far as I can see, C-FACO is currently assigned to a CN560.
- C-GSAT would be indeed new, as the reg was an Air Transat A310 before. So you may give priority to this photo in order to keep the HOT criteria.
My 5 cents.
Regards AKH

[arseni628]

Not a screener, but
All 3 soft
1 borderline noisy
2 aircraft not centered (too low)

[thebigdog360]

Hello, would appreciate any feedback regarding these business jets. In order, N443QS, C-GSAT, & C-FACO.