Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

UNWW pre-screening

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • UNWW
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    No halos on the first, but other two still present. Contrast borderline at best. The cropped rotors are ok for me, but others might not like that.
    Thanks for helping!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by UNWW View Post
    Hello, I added brightness and removed all post-processing. What do you say in this case?
    No halos on the first, but other two still present. Contrast borderline at best. The cropped rotors are ok for me, but others might not like that.

    Leave a comment:


  • UNWW
    replied
    Hello, I added brightness and removed all post-processing. What do you say in this case? Click image for larger version

Name:	UNNM RA-06325.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	448.3 KB
ID:	1146067Click image for larger version

Name:	UNNM RA-07365.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	453.5 KB
ID:	1146068Click image for larger version

Name:	UNNM RA-07400.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	483.2 KB
ID:	1146069

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by UNWW View Post
    Hello, request for pre-screening. It is necessary to make a mark in the category "Small Prop" ?
    Dark and overprocessed. These are helicopters, not small props.

    Leave a comment:


  • UNWW
    replied
    Hello, request for pre-screening. It is necessary to make a mark in the category "Small Prop" ? Click image for larger version

Name:	UNNM RA-06325.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	497.9 KB
ID:	1145975Click image for larger version

Name:	UNNM RA-07365.jpg
Views:	29
Size:	542.6 KB
ID:	1145976Click image for larger version

Name:	UNNM RA-07400.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	563.1 KB
ID:	1145977

    Leave a comment:


  • UNWW
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Yes.
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by UNWW View Post
    Hello, I ask for advice. I want to place the pictures in the category "Airport Overview" is such framing acceptable?
    Yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • UNWW
    replied
    Hello, I ask for advice. I want to place the pictures in the category "Airport Overview" is such framing acceptable?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	1DX27748.jpg
Views:	50
Size:	544.3 KB
ID:	1145821Click image for larger version

Name:	1DX27780.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	559.3 KB
ID:	1145822Click image for larger version

Name:	1DX27734.jpg
Views:	40
Size:	494.5 KB
ID:	1145823
    And another picture in the category "Terminal"
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Terminal.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	561.7 KB
ID:	1145824

    Leave a comment:


  • UNWW
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. soft/heat hazed
    2. obstruction
    Thanks

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by UNWW View Post
    Hello, request for pre-screening.
    1. soft/heat hazed
    2. obstruction

    Leave a comment:


  • UNWW
    replied
    Hello, request for pre-screening. Click image for larger version

Name:	UNNM RA-07832.jpg
Views:	30
Size:	1.49 MB
ID:	1145760Click image for larger version

Name:	UNWW RA-42445.jpg
Views:	20
Size:	1.34 MB
ID:	1145761

    Leave a comment:


  • UNWW
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Motive might be questionable, but the clutter seems unavoidable.
    Thanks, I'll upload a photo.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by UNWW View Post
    Hello, I want to add a photo of an abandoned airport. I'm worried about the mess in the foreground. Acceptable?
    Motive might be questionable, but the clutter seems unavoidable.

    Leave a comment:


  • UNWW
    replied
    Hello, I want to add a photo of an abandoned airport. I'm worried about the mess in the foreground. Acceptable?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Biya Airport - UNBI.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	1.43 MB
ID:	1145496

    Leave a comment:


  • UNWW
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Quality looks generally passable to me; motive on the first might be questionable for some due to it not immediately being identifiable as an airport, but it would be ok for me.
    Thank you, I will add it to the queue, I hope other screeners will not reject it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X