Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMGEnthusiast63 - prescreening request / editing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Only potential issue I see is sharpening.
    By the way, how can I tell if sharpening is appropriate? I've tried eyeballing it but it doesn't seem to work, so I've returned to applying a specific range of sharpening degree for similar photos. It has worked somehow, but sometimes it fails (as with the 787 above, too soft I guess?). Do you refer to specific details(ie clear regs, no jagged edges, no blurry borders etc.), or are there other methods of evaluating sharpness?
    Also, I've noticed that aircraft with relatively smaller registrations are frequently too soft(as with the 787 above), do I need extra sharpening for smaller regs?
    Many thanks!

    Comment


    • #92
      Click image for larger version

Name:	usm20l30+20_5592.jpg
Views:	107
Size:	511.6 KB
ID:	1154022Click image for larger version

Name:	usm18l30+15_328U.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	516.1 KB
ID:	1154023Click image for larger version

Name:	usm25l30+20_1913.jpg
Views:	107
Size:	515.3 KB
ID:	1154024Click image for larger version

Name:	usm20l30+20_300N.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	537.5 KB
ID:	1154025Click image for larger version

Name:	usm20l30+10_6507.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	462.3 KB
ID:	1154026 By the way, I'd like prescreening for these photos, thanks so much!

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by AMGEnthusiast63 View Post
        By the way, I'd like prescreening for these photos, thanks so much!
        Some soft spots, but mostly ok for me.

        Comment


        • #94
          Click image for larger version

Name:	image_52923.jpg
Views:	108
Size:	508.6 KB
ID:	1154090Click image for larger version

Name:	image_52924.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	514.1 KB
ID:	1154091Click image for larger version

Name:	image_52897.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	515.3 KB
ID:	1154092Click image for larger version

Name:	image_52925.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	541.1 KB
ID:	1154093Click image for larger version

Name:	usm18+8l30+5_208A.jpg
Views:	96
Size:	491.2 KB
ID:	1154095 Hi Dana! I added a bit of sharpening, hope they're even better now.(especially the 787, I had problems with it earlier on)
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by AMGEnthusiast63 View Post
            Hi Dana! I added a bit of sharpening, hope they're even better now.(especially the 787, I had problems with it earlier on)
            Still borderline, imho.

            Comment


            • #96
              Click image for larger version

Name:	usm35.jpg
Views:	98
Size:	498.3 KB
ID:	1154243Click image for larger version

Name:	usm40.jpg
Views:	105
Size:	499.8 KB
ID:	1154242 Hi Dana, which of these two has better sharpening, or would both of them be acceptable? Thanks!

              Comment


              • #97
                Hi, I would like prescreening for the 787, thanks!(Which of these two is better sharpened?)
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by AMGEnthusiast63 View Post
                  Hi, I would like prescreening for the 787, thanks!(Which of these two is better sharpened?)
                  Don't see a significant difference.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    Don't see a significant difference.
                    That said, would those two be considered properly sharpened? Thanks!
                    Also, I'd like the C919 below prescreened, thanks!
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by AMGEnthusiast63 View Post

                      That said, would those two be considered properly sharpened? Thanks!
                      Also, I'd like the C919 below prescreened, thanks!
                      Some soft spots visible, especially towards the tail on the latter.

                      Comment


                      • Hi, I tried two sharpening levels, would these two C919s be considered properly sharpened?

                        Also I added more sharpening for the 787, is it acceptable?

                        Many thanks!
                        Attached Files

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by AMGEnthusiast63 View Post
                          Hi, I tried two sharpening levels, would these two C919s be considered properly sharpened?

                          Also I added more sharpening for the 787, is it acceptable?

                          Many thanks!
                          Don't see a big difference. All borderline soft, but ok for me.

                          Comment


                          • These two are probably final, would the sharpening be optimal? Thanks!
                            Attached Files

                            Comment


                            • BTW would the C919 count as a night shot? Thanks!

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by AMGEnthusiast63 View Post
                                These two are probably final, would the sharpening be optimal? Thanks!
                                Still borderline. Yes night shot.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X