Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MarinoCodes - Prescreening Request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MarinoCodes View Post

    Should I bump it up a little bit? I tried it with Topaz Denoise AI trial version and it looked fine there, I'll try to replicate it and then post it here.
    If you hope to see it accepted, it would need to be sharper.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarinoCodes
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Still likely a rejection for soft.
    Should I bump it up a little bit? I tried it with Topaz Denoise AI trial version and it looked fine there, I'll try to replicate it and then post it here.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MarinoCodes View Post

    I've increased the sharpening for image #2.
    Is this acceptable?
    Still likely a rejection for soft.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarinoCodes
    replied
    Also, when you have the time, can't find the place to rename the thread, thought you could rename it somewhere or instruct me how to?
    I want the new thread name "MarinoCodes - Prescreening Request".
    Thanks in advance.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarinoCodes
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
    More sharpening should address softness/a lack of sharpening.
    I've increased the sharpening for image #2.
    Is this acceptable?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • MarinoCodes
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    More sharpening should address softness/a lack of sharpening.



    Perhaps you missed it, but I mentioned it was not fixable. Not much point in providing prescreening for an image that is very unlikely to ever be accepted, especially when you've ignored that specific advice
    Alright, will do that tomorrow.

    ​​​​​And, yes, sorry I did miss that it wasn't fixable, my apologies!

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MarinoCodes View Post

    What would you suggest I change to do that? Input appreciated
    More sharpening should address softness/a lack of sharpening.

    Originally posted by MarinoCodes View Post
    Oh, and sorry, just saw you didn't pre-screen N515AL. Since you didn't comment anything, is it OK or still needs adjustment?
    Perhaps you missed it, but I mentioned it was not fixable. Not much point in providing prescreening for an image that is very unlikely to ever be accepted, especially when you've ignored that specific advice

    Leave a comment:


  • MarinoCodes
    replied
    Oh, and sorry, just saw you didn't pre-screen N515AL. Since you didn't comment anything, is it OK or still needs adjustment?

    Leave a comment:


  • MarinoCodes
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Helicopter still a bit soft, but horizon/centering/exposure should be ok.
    What would you suggest I change to do that? Input appreciated

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MarinoCodes View Post

    Cheers, I've crossed 3 and 4 off the list.
    However, I've attempted fixing 1 and 2.

    For the first, I've increased both sharpening and noise reduction, not sure if this is too little still since if I put it higher, the image will look smudgy.
    And then for the second image, I've centered the image, hopefully levelled the horizon better, increased the sharpening and the noise reduction to compensate for the sharpening. I then tried to make the image brighter by increasing the exposure.

    If any of those input adjustments sound wrong to you, please correct me, as I'm a beginner to photography.
    Helicopter still a bit soft, but horizon/centering/exposure should be ok.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarinoCodes
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    1. soft, noisy
    2. horizon, dark, soft, centering
    3. horizon, soft, noisy, backlit
    4. horizon, soft, noisy, contrast/dark

    #2 might be fixable, the others not.
    Cheers, I've crossed 3 and 4 off the list.
    However, I've attempted fixing 1 and 2.

    For the first, I've increased both sharpening and noise reduction, not sure if this is too little still since if I put it higher, the image will look smudgy.
    And then for the second image, I've centered the image, hopefully levelled the horizon better, increased the sharpening and the noise reduction to compensate for the sharpening. I then tried to make the image brighter by increasing the exposure.

    If any of those input adjustments sound wrong to you, please correct me, as I'm a beginner to photography.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MarinoCodes View Post
    Okay, here we go again.
    Went to the airport today and took some shots and then edited them.
    I'd like pre-screening if able.
    See attachments.
    1. soft, noisy
    2. horizon, dark, soft, centering
    3. horizon, soft, noisy, backlit
    4. horizon, soft, noisy, contrast/dark

    #2 might be fixable, the others not.

    Leave a comment:


  • MarinoCodes
    replied
    Okay, here we go again.
    Went to the airport today and took some shots and then edited them.
    I'd like pre-screening if able.
    See attachments.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • MarinoCodes
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    Not sure exactly what you mean..an image could be rejected if there is too much visible noise. Whether that noise was a result of a lack of noise reduction, or oversharpening, or just high ISO settings, I couldn't guess.
    Alright, thanks.

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by MarinoCodes View Post

    Oh, that's weird, didn't know that. Is there a way to get a rejection if you don't apply noise reduction when it's needed?
    Not sure exactly what you mean..an image could be rejected if there is too much visible noise. Whether that noise was a result of a lack of noise reduction, or oversharpening, or just high ISO settings, I couldn't guess.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X