Prescreening Advice for GYB_ZBYN

[GYB_ZBYN]

Hi there, can you have a brief look at this one? I want to upload it as runway but not sure about whether it is acceptable.

[Charlie Chang]

Hi there, can you have a brief look at this one? I want to upload it as runway but not sure about whether it is acceptable.

Not screener
Yes it would be acceptable, but the weather is a bit bad,(may cause contrast rejection)

[GYB_ZBYN]

Not screener
Yes it would be acceptable, but the weather is a bit bad,(may cause contrast rejection)

Thanks! The weather was indeed not so good. So do you think the contrast shall be more or less?

[Charlie Chang]

Thanks! The weather was indeed not so good. So do you think the contrast shall be more or less?

sometimes the meaning of contrast rejection is bad weather

[GYB_ZBYN]

sometimes the meaning of contrast rejection is bad weather

So it won't be possible to fix it right?

[Charlie Chang]

So it won't be possible to fix it right?

If you're lucky, this photo will pass.

[GYB_ZBYN]

If you're lucky, this photo will pass.

I guess the word 'lucky' isn't for me lol
The helicopter has been rejected with a comment 'for your personal collection'.
I guess I'm not going to try this.

[dlowwa]

Hi there, can you have a brief look at this one? I want to upload it as runway but not sure about whether it is acceptable.

Quite soft and a bit noisy. Contrast is acceptable.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Hello! I wonder if this is wrongly rejected. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10603278
You can see that the focal lenth is very short (24mm or so), which leads to the lines on the left qnd right side being not vertical. However, the one in the middle, next to the prop, is exactly vertical. So could anyone reconsider this rejection, or give me some suggestions on adjusting the horizon in situations like this?
Thanks!

[dlowwa]

Hello! I wonder if this is wrongly rejected. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10603278
You can see that the focal lenth is very short (24mm or so), which leads to the lines on the left qnd right side being not vertical. However, the one in the middle, next to the prop, is exactly vertical. So could anyone reconsider this rejection, or give me some suggestions on adjusting the horizon in situations like this?
Thanks!

I can't really tell myself, but looks like maybe a touch of CW rotation is needed.

[GYB_ZBYN]

I can't really tell myself, but looks like maybe a touch of CW rotation is needed.

Well... If so, how can I tell that the horizon is leveled when there isn't any line matching? After all, one line is matching the grids in my photo right now.
Also, this is exactly what my drone has originally captured. If you've ever had a DJI drone you would know that it would level the picture automatically.
No offense, appreciative for your reply as well, but I still think this is correct. So may I ask you how to judge the horizon please? Thanks!

[dlowwa]

So may I ask you how to judge the horizon please? Thanks!

Verticals in the center of the frame.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Verticals in the center of the frame.

I thoought this was just what I did lol
Anyway I've added some CW rotation, having this one. Would you mind giving some opinions?
The another was formally rejected due to underexposed. I've also adjusted. Hope you could also see if this could work.
By the way, may I bother you to help find the S/N of the latter (B-103A)? Th einformation website which we Chinese could access was broken days ago.
Thanks!

[dlowwa]

I thoought this was just what I did lol
Anyway I've added some CW rotation, having this one. Would you mind giving some opinions?
The another was formally rejected due to underexposed. I've also adjusted. Hope you could also see if this could work.
By the way, may I bother you to help find the S/N of the latter (B-103A)? Th einformation website which we Chinese could access was broken days ago.
Thanks!

1. needs a little CW still. Try to get the beam in the center perfectly straight.
2. exposure ok, but borderline contrast. if the cn is not easily locatable online you can upload without it.

[GYB_ZBYN]

1. needs a little CW still. Try to get the beam in the center perfectly straight.
2. exposure ok, but borderline contrast. if the cn is not easily locatable online you can upload without it.

It's getting a bit tricky...
I've changed to another, for which I made the right edge of the central beam exactly straight. I guess this would be better.
For the prop I don't know whether the contrast is too much or too little, but anyway I had a try.
Also, would there be any possibility for this runway photo to be accepted?
Regards!