Prescreening Advice for GYB_ZBYN

[dlowwa]

It's getting a bit tricky...
I've changed to another, for which I made the right edge of the central beam exactly straight. I guess this would be better.
For the prop I don't know whether the contrast is too much or too little, but anyway I had a try.
Also, would there be any possibility for this runway photo to be accepted?
Regards!

1. horizon looks ok to me, but some quality issues
2. still borderline at best
3. motive is ok, quality borderline

[GYB_ZBYN]

1. horizon looks ok to me, but some quality issues
2. still borderline at best
3. motive is ok, quality borderline

Thanks! May you give me some more detailed opinions on the 'quality issues'? Regards!

[dlowwa]

Thanks! May you give me some more detailed opinions on the 'quality issues'? Regards!

Contrast/lighting, sharpness.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Contrast/lighting, sharpness.

Okay, I've tried to have the small prop fixed, like this:

Also, I have no idea if the runway photo could be fixed. Hope you could tell me if it should be given up.
Thanks!

[dlowwa]

Okay, I've tried to have the small prop fixed, like this:

Also, I have no idea if the runway photo could be fixed. Hope you could tell me if it should be given up.
Thanks!

Contrast still poor, centering is off, and still soft. Not sure it's fixable. Runway is soft/poor contrast.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Contrast still poor, centering is off, and still soft. Not sure it's fixable. Runway is soft/poor contrast.

Thanks!
I guess I will use another runway like this.
Also, for the two museum planes, I'm not sure if they could be accepted, as they were taken in 2013(a long time ago isn't it). And if possible, can they be regarded as hot? I had some difficulty determining the latter's reg in the database.

[dlowwa]

Thanks!
I guess I will use another runway like this.
Also, for the two museum planes, I'm not sure if they could be accepted, as they were taken in 2013(a long time ago isn't it). And if possible, can they be regarded as hot? I had some difficulty determining the latter's reg in the database.

1. soft/blurry, compression
2-3. borderline quality, but should be ok

If there is no registration/cn, then they cannot be considered hot.

[GYB_ZBYN]

1. soft/blurry, compression
2-3. borderline quality, but should be ok

If there is no registration/cn, then they cannot be considered hot.

Thanks! I will add them to normal queue.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Hello! I wonder if these ones are acceptable or fixable. If there's contrast issue, how should I fix? Thanks!

[dlowwa]

Hello! I wonder if these ones are acceptable or fixable. If there's contrast issue, how should I fix? Thanks!

1 ok for me
2-3 soft/blurry, not fixable.
4 weak contrast

[GYB_ZBYN]

1 ok for me
2-3 soft/blurry, not fixable.
4 weak contrast

OK, for the two I got other ones like these:
Also, I captured the third and fourth ones in a morning, when the sunlight shone from the back side. I wonder if they would be regarded as backlit.
Thanks!

[dlowwa]

OK, for the two I got other ones like these:
Also, I captured the third and fourth ones in a morning, when the sunlight shone from the back side. I wonder if they would be regarded as backlit.
Thanks!

1-2. oversharpened, maybe a bit blurry. Borderline contrast.
3. borderline contrast

[GYB_ZBYN]

1-2. oversharpened, maybe a bit blurry. Borderline contrast.
3. borderline contrast

Thanks. Do you think any of them could be fixed? If yes, how?
Also, will the following one be considered ok?

[dlowwa]

Thanks. Do you think any of them could be fixed? If yes, how?

Third might be acceptable as-is, or with a better edit.

Also, will the following one be considered ok?

No.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Third might be acceptable as-is, or with a better edit.



No.

Thx.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10670037

By the way why is this regarded as horizon unleveled? As you can see, the vertical lines are fairly correct, take the following parts for example.