Prescreening Advice for GYB_ZBYN

[GYB_ZBYN]

The same for this one...
I believe the horizon is good.

https://www.jetphotos.com/members/showphotoinfo.php?loc=rej&id=10670048&type=2&photo=https://cdn.jetphotos.com/full/6/80792_1670025042.jpg

[dlowwa]

Thx.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10670037

By the way why is this regarded as horizon unleveled? As you can see, the vertical lines are fairly correct, take the following parts for example.

Needs CW rotation.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Needs CW rotation.

But why
Zooming up the photo, the lines seems to match perfectly.
Anyway, could you tell me which part I should refer to to adjust the horizon? Thanks.

[dlowwa]

But why
Zooming up the photo, the lines seems to match perfectly.
Anyway, could you tell me which part I should refer to to adjust the horizon? Thanks.

Verticals in the background. They're leaning left.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Hello, could you please leave some comment on this? Also, should it be with 'night shot' category? This was taken short after sunset.
Thx.

[dlowwa]

Hello, could you please leave some comment on this? Also, should it be with 'night shot' category? This was taken short after sunset.
Thx.

Blurry. Not fixable.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Blurry. Not fixable.

Thx.I'll give it up.
Can these two be okay?

[Charlie Chang]

Thx.I'll give it up.
Can these two be okay?

not screener, photo 2 is possible get motive and horizon rejection.
Hope it helps.

[dlowwa]

Thx.I'll give it up.
Can these two be okay?

1. borderline dark
2. horizon

[GYB_ZBYN]

Thx for your suggestions.
I really wonder why this was rejected due to dust spots. I cannot find it anywhere.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10770012

[dlowwa]

Thx for your suggestions.
I really wonder why this was rejected due to dust spots. I cannot find it anywhere.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10770012

Very faint one in the sky above the registration, but not at all visible without equalizing. I've added the photo.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Very faint one in the sky above the registration, but not at all visible without equalizing. I've added the photo.

I see it LOL
Many thanks!

[GYB_ZBYN]

Hello! I wonder if the following ones are acceptable.

Btw, I am confused about this rejection.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10839247

I've been rejected for many times, but the sharpness seems still not enough. As you can see there are already very many sawteeth next to the lines. I think it is sharp enough already. If you don't think so, would you mind to tell me the standard you use to judge?

And these two.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10853819

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10853818

According to whether the direct look or the histogram, the contrast seems acceptable. After all, the ground is in dark colour and thus when exposure is ok the contrast would look a little bit harsh, but anyway I think it is understandable.

Thx and best regards!

[GYB_ZBYN]

Hi,

May I bother you with the post above?

Thx.

[dlowwa]

Hi,

May I bother you with the post above?

Thx.

The contrast rejections look acceptable to me, though there is a lack of direct light.

1. soft, contrast, too far
2. contrast, horizon
3. motive
4. heat haze
5. ok for me