Prescreening Advice for GYB_ZBYN

[GYB_ZBYN]

Possibly could be different enough.

Thank you sir!
Here are two alternatives, and I cannot choose which is better. May you please help me check if this pic is acceptable? Thanks.

[dlowwa]

Dear screener, I wonder if I am allowed to upload two pictures of one aircraft from a very similar angle, yet one was taken in daytime while the other at night. Regards.

Possibly could be different enough.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Dear screener, I wonder if I am allowed to upload two pictures of one aircraft from a very similar angle, yet one was taken in daytime while the other at night. Regards.

[Alex - Spot-This !]

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10912096 not really an airport overview. About 1/3 of the frame is just a fence, very questionnable motive there, one for the personnal collection.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10912095 You need to learn to use the histogram as the photo here has big issues with both overexposure and underexposure. Again, most probably one for the personal collection as the light is really not appealing.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10912093 Verticals in the center are leaning to right but main issue for me here is the motive. What are you trying to show ? Some commercial signs, a waiting line ? Nothing appealing and I absolutely recommend not uploading such photos due to their very little interest for an aviation database.

Hope it helps
Alex

[GYB_ZBYN]

Hello,
I really wonder why this is rejected. All the info seem correct. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10912096

This is rejected due to underexposure, but I believe if I'd had more exposure it will definitely be overexposed. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10912095

And this one. As you can see in the attached photo, the middle part is correctly leveled. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10912093

Hope you could give me some suggestions. Regards.

[dlowwa]

Hello!

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10853839

For this rejection, I think the head part of the plane is already really bright and the upper part of the main body is also correctly exposed. As for the contrast, I have no idea why it is not acceptable as the histogram's elements are balanced. May I have your opinion? Thanks!

Regards.

For me exposure ok, but borderline (weak) contrast.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Hello!

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10853839

For this rejection, I think the head part of the plane is already really bright and the upper part of the main body is also correctly exposed. As for the contrast, I have no idea why it is not acceptable as the histogram's elements are balanced. May I have your opinion? Thanks!

Regards.

[GYB_ZBYN]

You can appeal any rejection you feel was not warranted, but understand that my opinion will not influence the outcome of that appeal.

Obstacles and people's faces.

All right. I'll change the resource photo. Thx.

[dlowwa]

Thanks! So may I appeal the two rejections?

Btw, why the terminal photo is bad motivation? Is it caused by any obstacles? Or how should I do the cropping with a terminal photo?

You can appeal any rejection you feel was not warranted, but understand that my opinion will not influence the outcome of that appeal.

Obstacles and people's faces.

[GYB_ZBYN]

The contrast rejections look acceptable to me, though there is a lack of direct light.

1. soft, contrast, too far
2. contrast, horizon
3. motive
4. heat haze
5. ok for me

Thanks! So may I appeal the two rejections?

Btw, why the terminal photo is bad motivation? Is it caused by any obstacles? Or how should I do the cropping with a terminal photo?

[dlowwa]

Hi,

May I bother you with the post above?

Thx.

The contrast rejections look acceptable to me, though there is a lack of direct light.

1. soft, contrast, too far
2. contrast, horizon
3. motive
4. heat haze
5. ok for me

[GYB_ZBYN]

Hi,

May I bother you with the post above?

Thx.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Hello! I wonder if the following ones are acceptable.

Btw, I am confused about this rejection.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10839247

I've been rejected for many times, but the sharpness seems still not enough. As you can see there are already very many sawteeth next to the lines. I think it is sharp enough already. If you don't think so, would you mind to tell me the standard you use to judge?

And these two.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10853819

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10853818

According to whether the direct look or the histogram, the contrast seems acceptable. After all, the ground is in dark colour and thus when exposure is ok the contrast would look a little bit harsh, but anyway I think it is understandable.

Thx and best regards!

[GYB_ZBYN]

Very faint one in the sky above the registration, but not at all visible without equalizing. I've added the photo.

I see it LOL
Many thanks!

[dlowwa]

Thx for your suggestions.
I really wonder why this was rejected due to dust spots. I cannot find it anywhere.
https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10770012

Very faint one in the sky above the registration, but not at all visible without equalizing. I've added the photo.