Prescreening Advice for GYB_ZBYN

[GYB_ZBYN]

Hello! This one have been rejected several times, but the contrast is still not acceptable to the screener. So could you give some suggestions on how to improve? Also, I've been confused about how to judge the contrast, and hope you could also give me a helping hand on this. Any reply would be appreciated. Thanks and regards!

[dlowwa]

Hello! This one have been rejected several times, but the contrast is still not acceptable to the screener. So could you give some suggestions on how to improve? Also, I've been confused about how to judge the contrast, and hope you could also give me a helping hand on this. Any reply would be appreciated.

Contrast looks nearly acceptable for me, though there is an issue with softness/blurriness in the tail area. It seems that the image was taken in low/overcast light, so you have shadows on some parts of the aircraft, yet the top of the fuselage is nearly blown out. Images taken in such conditions will always be a bit more challenging to get accepted.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Contrast looks nearly acceptable for me, though there is an issue with softness/blurriness in the tail area. It seems that the image was taken in low/overcast light, so you have shadows on some parts of the aircraft, yet the top of the fuselage is nearly blown out. Images taken in such conditions will always be a bit more challenging to get accepted.

Thanks! Yeah it was indeed an overcast day. So can I make a conclusion that I could just care about the sharpness and noise, and then upload it?

[GYB_ZBYN]

Contrast looks nearly acceptable for me, though there is an issue with softness/blurriness in the tail area. It seems that the image was taken in low/overcast light, so you have shadows on some parts of the aircraft, yet the top of the fuselage is nearly blown out. Images taken in such conditions will always be a bit more challenging to get accepted.

Hi! Anyway I've adjusted it again. So is it acceptable now?

[dlowwa]

Hi! Anyway I've adjusted it again. So is it acceptable now?

If it's a new frame I'd forgive the borderline contrast, though the soft/blurriness in the tail is still somewhat noticeable.

[GYB_ZBYN]

If it's a new frame I'd forgive the borderline contrast, though the soft/blurriness in the tail is still somewhat noticeable.

Hi! I'd say that I can't see the noise but anyway I added some sharpness and noise control again, and got this one. Is this better?

[GYB_ZBYN]

Also, would this another air-to-ground photo be acceptable? (And would this be regarded as a hot photo? The operator is changed.)

[dlowwa]

Hi! I'd say that I can't see the noise but anyway I added some sharpness and noise control again, and got this one. Is this better?

I don't think I mentioned noise anywhere, did I? Tail is still soft/blurry. You might want to try a different image.

Also, would this another air-to-ground photo be acceptable? (And would this be regarded as a hot photo? The operator is changed.

Would be ok for me.

[GYB_ZBYN]

I don't think I mentioned noise anywhere, did I? Tail is still soft/blurry. You might want to try a different image.



Would be ok for me.

Sorry for my misunderstanding ;D
For a long period of time I've been regarding blurry and noisy as the same thing. So shall I understand that I shouldn't add any anti-noise but only sharpness?
Sorry again and thanks for your patience!

[GYB_ZBYN]

I don't think I mentioned noise anywhere, did I? Tail is still soft/blurry. You might want to try a different image.



Would be ok for me.

Thanks anyway! Would this be better?

[GYB_ZBYN]

I don't think I mentioned noise anywhere, did I? Tail is still soft/blurry. You might want to try a different image.



Would be ok for me.

Sorry that the above one has some quality issues lol. You could just consider this one. Thanks!

[dlowwa]

Sorry that the above one has some quality issues lol. You could just consider this one. Thanks!

Same problems. Like I said, you can try a different image, but I'm not going to comment on this one anymore.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Same problems. Like I said, you can try a different image, but I'm not going to comment on this one anymore.

All right, I guess I shall give up this one... Anyway I'm really grateful for your instructions.

So are these following ones acceptable? I'm not sure about the exposure and the sharpness.

[dlowwa]

All right, I guess I shall give up this one... Anyway I'm really grateful for your instructions.

So are these following ones acceptable? I'm not sure about the exposure and the sharpness.

There are issues with softness and contrast on the first four, and heat haze on the last.

[GYB_ZBYN]

Thanks! So is there any opportunity to save them? Would you mind if you give me some detailed suggestions?