Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pre-screening request

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post
    Hate to be a bother but I find it very difficult to judge contrast and exposure, are these good for both?
    I don't think exposure or contrast would really be issues with these.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oojiflip
    replied
    Hate to be a bother but I find it very difficult to judge contrast and exposure, are these good for both?



    Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-EKS.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	570.8 KB
ID:	1153964Click image for larger version

Name:	F-HBLF.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	672.6 KB
ID:	1153965Click image for larger version

Name:	G-JZHK.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	707.4 KB
ID:	1153966Click image for larger version

Name:	D-AILK.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	724.8 KB
ID:	1153967Click image for larger version

Name:	G-TTOE.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	649.8 KB
ID:	1153968

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post
    Would this be OK? Not sure how grass counts in terms of obstruction.
    Horizon, soft, and yes borderline obstruction.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oojiflip
    replied
    Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
    As the 737 is also obstructed by the luggage cart, there's no real good reasons to include it completely.

    But on a similar case, without obstruction, yes it's totally ok to include the whole big plane in the frame like here :

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/6205249

    Regards
    Alex
    Good to know, thank you!

    Leave a comment:


  • Alex - Spot-This !
    replied
    As the 737 is also obstructed by the luggage cart, there's no real good reasons to include it completely.

    But on a similar case, without obstruction, yes it's totally ok to include the whole big plane in the frame like here :

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/6205249

    Regards
    Alex

    Leave a comment:


  • Oojiflip
    replied
    Would this be OK? Not sure how grass counts in terms of obstruction.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	ZM407.jpg
Views:	32
Size:	656.4 KB
ID:	1153840

    Leave a comment:


  • Oojiflip
    replied
    Hi all,
    Just wondering if something like the following image is allowed. Would it count as being an image of the front plane recropped to include the background 737 as I'm guessing the other way around the JS41 would count as an obstruction.
    Thanks!
    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-MAJB2.jpg
Views:	265
Size:	608.0 KB
ID:	1153838

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post
    Hi again!
    Are these OK? I've got a new camera so I'm not too sure how to edit them for now, I've tried to use USM in photoshop to try to get them sharper as most of my newer pics have been described as blurred.
    1-2. dark/harsh contrast
    3. dark/harsh contrast, soft, cut off
    4. blurry, dark/harsh contrast
    5. soft

    Leave a comment:


  • Oojiflip
    replied
    Hi again!
    Are these OK? I've got a new camera so I'm not too sure how to edit them for now, I've tried to use USM in photoshop to try to get them sharper as most of my newer pics have been described as blurred.
    Thanks!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	PH-BGA2.jpg
Views:	51
Size:	391.3 KB
ID:	1153315Click image for larger version

Name:	G-TAWR3.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	423.0 KB
ID:	1153316Click image for larger version

Name:	KAF3432.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	563.3 KB
ID:	1153317Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-EGL2.jpg
Views:	46
Size:	479.4 KB
ID:	1153318Click image for larger version

Name:	G-EUYB2.jpg
Views:	47
Size:	666.7 KB
ID:	1153319

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post

    Would these be OK?
    1. soft
    2. soft/blurry/heat hazed
    3-5. borderline soft

    Leave a comment:


  • Oojiflip
    replied
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    You are correct, contrast is harsh, especially on first four. Last one might be acceptable as-is.
    Would these be OK?

    Click image for larger version

Name:	G-KEMD2.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	479.3 KB
ID:	1152914Click image for larger version

Name:	A6-ECZ4.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	498.1 KB
ID:	1152915Click image for larger version

Name:	OY-ASB.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	721.5 KB
ID:	1152916Click image for larger version

Name:	G-TAWY.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	721.2 KB
ID:	1152917Click image for larger version

Name:	F-HBLP.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	720.4 KB
ID:	1152918

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post
    Hi!
    Would love if someone would please tell me if these pics are okay, the histograms are there but some look like they're really high contrast.
    You are correct, contrast is harsh, especially on first four. Last one might be acceptable as-is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oojiflip
    replied
    Hi!
    Would love if someone would please tell me if these pics are okay, the histograms are there but some look like they're really high contrast.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	OY-ASB.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	420.3 KB
ID:	1152841Click image for larger version

Name:	EI-EKS.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	386.7 KB
ID:	1152842Click image for larger version

Name:	G-JZHM.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	589.5 KB
ID:	1152843Click image for larger version

Name:	F-HBLP.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	702.7 KB
ID:	1152844Click image for larger version

Name:	G-JZBK.jpg
Views:	106
Size:	787.2 KB
ID:	1152845

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by Oojiflip View Post

    Sorry for bothering, but do you think that's better?
    Yes, should be fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • Oojiflip
    replied
    Originally posted by JuklicekCZ View Post
    Hello, not a screenerer, but 1 seems to be heat hazed and 2 appears to be soft/blurry, noisy and borderline overprocessed.
    Sorry for bothering, but do you think that's better?
    Click image for larger version

Name:	JetPhotos F-HDTT 2.jpg
Views:	271
Size:	907.2 KB
ID:	1144677

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X