Hey all, sorry to be a nuisance but I had this photo rejected last night - https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=10416938 for obstruction.
From my understanding, it has been rejected for the cones being in the way of the wheels.
I noted that the exemptions are sometimes made when ' the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed, such as ground power units/cargo loading devices.'.
Do cones also count under this?
Because i'm assuming that exemption was used when the most recent photo of VH-XZH was uploaded, with cones obstructing the aircraft in practically the same positions.
Was wondering where the line is drawn and if this photo would be eligible for an appeal. Cheers.
From my understanding, it has been rejected for the cones being in the way of the wheels.
I noted that the exemptions are sometimes made when ' the angle of the shot means only a small part of the aircraft is obstructed, such as ground power units/cargo loading devices.'.
Do cones also count under this?
Because i'm assuming that exemption was used when the most recent photo of VH-XZH was uploaded, with cones obstructing the aircraft in practically the same positions.
Was wondering where the line is drawn and if this photo would be eligible for an appeal. Cheers.
Comment