Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

theindianspotter - pre screening

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by theindianspotter View Post
    Hello, I went to spot this airplane once again, this is the best shot I got of it, it’s looking quite good and detailed in higher res, but not so great at 1280 even when the quality is at 100, would this be able to make it in?
    Image is soft. You can try posting/sharing the full-res if you want me to check whether that is actually 'looking quite good'.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

      Image is soft. You can try posting/sharing the full-res if you want me to check whether that is actually 'looking quite good'.
      In Lr, it looks so good when zooming in, I don’t know why exports don’t seem so good…. Here‘s the ‘highest available resolution’ export

      https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fH7...ew?usp=sharing

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by theindianspotter View Post

        In Lr, it looks so good when zooming in, I don’t know why exports don’t seem so good…. Here‘s the ‘highest available resolution’ export
        Very noisy, but should be sharp enough. Perhaps you're applying some kind of noise reduction and that's causing softness? What ISO was that shot at?

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

          Very noisy, but should be sharp enough. Perhaps you're applying some kind of noise reduction and that's causing softness? What ISO was that shot at?
          ISO 160

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            Perhaps you're applying some kind of noise reduction and that's causing softness?
            I did another edit, is this any better?

            Attached Files

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by theindianspotter View Post

              I did another edit, is this any better?
              Would still be rejected for soft.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                Would still be rejected for soft.
                There’s literally no noise reduction in it… why is this happening……

                still tried making another edit…. Any good?
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by theindianspotter View Post

                  There’s literally no noise reduction in it… why is this happening……

                  still tried making another edit…. Any good?
                  Seems better, but this one is heavily compressed, so can't say for sure. As I said before, editing on a mobile device might not be the best option.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                    Seems better, but this one is heavily compressed, so can't say for sure. As I said before, editing on a mobile device might not be the best option.
                    Hmmmm, took the help of a friend with the PC edit, how about now?
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by theindianspotter View Post

                      Hmmmm, took the help of a friend with the PC edit, how about now?
                      Oversharpened and a bit noisy.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1957_02.jpg
Views:	33
Size:	724.4 KB
ID:	1149315
                        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                        Oversharpened and a bit noisy.
                        How about this one

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          or is this better…? Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1957 3.jpg
Views:	37
Size:	735.0 KB
ID:	1149317

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by theindianspotter View Post
                            or is this better…?
                            Sharpening is better, but there are other issues with contrast, horizon, and as I mentioned before, noise.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                              Sharpening is better, but there are other issues with contrast, horizon, and as I mentioned before, noise.
                              I fixed the above issues and uploaded it, it still got rejected for “under sharpened/soft” and horizon, I’ve made another edit yet again, what and how can I fix the issues, if any.
                              Attached Files

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by theindianspotter View Post

                                I fixed the above issues and uploaded it, it still got rejected for “under sharpened/soft” and horizon, I’ve made another edit yet again, what and how can I fix the issues, if any.
                                Borderline soft/contrast. Last time I will comment on this one.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X