Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

zhf21 - Prescreening Advice/Editing Advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    [QUOTE=zhf21;n1155615]
    Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

    I only reduced the contrast and sharpness slightly. I guess it wasn't enough. The contrast has now been reduced by another 20 and the sharpness has been increased by another 35.
    Borderline oversharpened/contrast.

    Comment


    • #62
      [QUOTE=dlowwa;n1155622]
      Originally posted by zhf21 View Post

      Borderline oversharpened/contrast.
      Contrast too low or too high?

      Comment


      • #63
        [QUOTE=zhf21;n1155645]
        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

        Contrast too low or too high?
        Neither. Weak light.

        Comment


        • #64
          [QUOTE=dlowwa;n1155688]
          Originally posted by zhf21 View Post

          Neither. Weak light.
          How would I fix that? Exposure? I'd appreciate some guidance.

          Comment


          • #65
            [QUOTE=zhf21;n1155692]
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            How would I fix that? Exposure? I'd appreciate some guidance.
            Not something you can easily 'fix' after the fact. Next time try shooting in better lighting conditions.

            Comment


            • #66
              Would this photo of the new Terminal A at EWR be acceptable?
              Attached Files

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by zhf21 View Post
                Would this photo of the new Terminal A at EWR be acceptable?
                Automatic motive rejection.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                  Automatic motive rejection.
                  Why? The photo highlights the sleek design of the airport’s new terminal. It also features the sign “Welcome to Terminal A.” The sign’s placement was intentional to indicate that this terminal is the start of a new EWR.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by zhf21 View Post

                    Why? The photo highlights the sleek design of the airport’s new terminal. It also features the sign “Welcome to Terminal A.” The sign’s placement was intentional to indicate that this terminal is the start of a new EWR.
                    Not a screener but I think because ppl face clearly at photo.

                    JP not have their permission post to internet , that’s mean will have “Bad Motive” reject.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by ksaviation View Post
                      Not a screener but I think because ppl face clearly at photo.

                      JP not have their permission post to internet , that’s mean will have “Bad Motive” reject.
                      Thank you for the information. What if I blurred their faces?

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by zhf21 View Post

                        Thank you for the information. What if I blurred their faces?
                        Hi,

                        blurrying faces isn't allowed at all and falls under manipulation. This causes sanctions if it is done repeatedly.
                        Why not try a natural "blurrying effect" by using longer exposures
                        Best Regards from Germany,
                        Julian S.​

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Julian S. View Post

                          Hi,

                          blurrying faces isn't allowed at all and falls under manipulation. This causes sanctions if it is done repeatedly.
                          Why not try a natural "blurrying effect" by using longer exposures
                          Thanks for the reply. While I understand this would be manipulation, I struggle to see why that rule applies to faces. If editing a photo to create the same result as taking the photo in a longer exposure, why can't it be allowed? Nothing else is being changed. I get it if I were adding or removing things from the picture, but if it creates the exact same result, I fail to see the problem.

                          Not to mention, there is a clear inconsistency with the rules. I've seen countless photos in the database with faces visible. Here are just a few examples:

                          ZYHB | Airport | Terminal | StevenN | JetPhotos

                          ZGSZ | Airport | Terminal | UniverseLin | JetPhotos

                          KRIC | Airport | Terminal | FR24 | JetPhotos
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by zhf21 View Post

                            Thank you for the information. What if I blurred their faces?
                            Will get “Digital Manipulation” reject and get warning
                            You can use tripod and longer exposures blur their faces.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by zhf21 View Post

                              Thanks for the reply. While I understand this would be manipulation, I struggle to see why that rule applies to faces. If editing a photo to create the same result as taking the photo in a longer exposure, why can't it be allowed? Nothing else is being changed. I get it if I were adding or removing things from the picture, but if it creates the exact same result, I fail to see the problem.

                              Not to mention, there is a clear inconsistency with the rules. I've seen countless photos in the database with faces visible. Here are just a few examples:

                              ZYHB | Airport | Terminal | StevenN | JetPhotos

                              ZGSZ | Airport | Terminal | UniverseLin | JetPhotos

                              KRIC | Airport | Terminal | FR24 | JetPhotos
                              In only one of those photos is a person's face easily identifiable, so there is no 'clear inconsistency', just an occasional error.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Morning, all.

                                Just curious what the specifics of this rejection are. The exposure was increased minimally, sharpness moderately, and only a touch of contrast. Is it salvageable with a different edit?

                                JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X