PreScreening Request/Advice

[henry1218]

This is the first photo I've taken.
Some photo advice, please.

[dlowwa]

This is the first photo I've taken.
Some photo advice, please.

These are issues with softness, framing, and lighting. Since they are not the actual images you would upload, more specifics or prescreening are not available.

[henry1218]

These are issues with softness, framing, and lighting. Since they are not the actual images you would upload, more specifics or prescreening are not available.

Thank you for your response
I've been having a hard time forgetting my password on the forum for a few days. I'm really sorry

[henry1218]

Hi!
I think that I am improving my photo correction method little by little by looking at my recent photos.
Can you tell me what is missing in my picture?
Thank you.

**The forum rules are upheld again.
This is how it's done, right?

[dlowwa]

Hi!
I think that I am improving my photo correction method little by little by looking at my recent photos.
Can you tell me what is missing in my picture?
Thank you.

**The forum rules are upheld again.
This is how it's done, right?

Once again, please read here carefully if you wish to get prescreening advice from the crew:

https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/aviation-photography-videography-forums/digital-photo-processing-forum/63048-suggestions-when-asking-for-editing-advice-prescreening-from-crew

6. Try to attach the exact images you plan to upload to your post (i.e. don't upload unedited image unless asking for general advice).

These images are not the images that you will actually upload, so offering advice would be of little use.

[henry1218]

As far as I understand, it means to upload the image correctly.
Is my understanding correct?
I'm sorry to keep bothering you

[dlowwa]

As far as I understand, it means to upload the image correctly.
Is my understanding correct?

This image is extremely soft. Nowhere near the quality needed for 1820pix.

[henry1218]

This image is extremely soft. Nowhere near the quality needed for 1820pix.

Your opinion was a great help to me. After +100 in the quality +30 detailed quality window in the light room classic, noise reduction +30 was done +30. Is the noise coming up from the dark okay?̊̈

[dlowwa]

Your opinion was a great help to me. After +100 in the quality +30 detailed quality window in the light room classic, noise reduction +30 was done +30. Is the noise coming up from the dark okay?̊̈

Unfortunately I do not understand your question, sorry.

[henry1218]

Unfortunately I do not understand your question, sorry.

I'm sorry that I'm not good at English yet.
These are my settings. Other than that, they're default status

[dlowwa]

I'm sorry that I'm not good at English yet.
These are my settings. Other than that, they're default status

Still somewhat soft, and now also noisy/overprocessed (lack of shadows indicating overuse of s/h tool or other).

The screenshot is too small to be able to read anything, and in any case, it's the quality of the original that will mostly dictate the final outcome, not your editing.

[henry1218]

Still somewhat soft, and now also noisy/overprocessed (lack of shadows indicating overuse of s/h tool or other).

The screenshot is too small to be able to read anything, and in any case, it's the quality of the original that will mostly dictate the final outcome, not your editing.

This is the original.

[henry1218]

Here's yesterday's screenshot

[henry1218]

Here's yesterday's screenshot

What settings should be made to prevent softness.
Or should I use a good lens and camera?
Currently, I am using eos r7 and rf100-400.
Thank you always for your kind reply

Texture +80, clarity+5

Detail
Sharpening
Amount +100
Radius 1.0
Datail +25
Masking 0

Noise Reduction
Luminance +10
Detail +62
Contrast 0

[dlowwa]

What settings should be made to prevent softness.
Or should I use a good lens and camera?
Currently, I am using eos r7 and rf100-400.
Thank you always for your kind reply

The screenshot is still much too small to be able to read anything, but those settings seem sufficient.

I doubt that's the actual 'original' image, as it's only 2300pix, and heavily compressed. If it is, then that's your problem right there. if it's not, I'd still only be speculating.