Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sander in West-Africa | screening requests

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Ibom Air arrived for the first time to Accra on their new route. Would the the picture below be acceptable for JP? I feel they may need some more contrast, but had many rejections on too much contrast before so I'm hesitant.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8764.jpg
Views:	121
Size:	430.4 KB
ID:	1171921

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by sanderzwart View Post
      Ibom Air arrived for the first time to Accra on their new route. Would the the picture below be acceptable for JP? I feel they may need some more contrast, but had many rejections on too much contrast before so I'm hesitant.
      A bit soft, but contrast looks acceptable (for me).

      Comment


      • #48
        my pictures below of a rre Freedom Airline Express was rejected for jpeg compression issues claimed around the logo and windows. I always use the same compression and the original is sharp, see link below.
        Not sure how to fix this as it may be an effect to resizing the images and the angle of the plane. Any suggestions?

        This is the original:

        The safest and most inclusive global community of photography enthusiasts. The best place for inspiration, connection, and sharing!
        Attached Files

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by sanderzwart View Post
          my pictures below of a rre Freedom Airline Express was rejected for jpeg compression issues claimed around the logo and windows. I always use the same compression and the original is sharp, see link below.
          Not sure how to fix this as it may be an effect to resizing the images and the angle of the plane. Any suggestions?

          This is the original:

          https://www.flickr.com/photos/rednas...50131/sizes/o/
          Original is anything but sharp, but the image you posted doesn't really have any compression issues I can see. Better if you post a link to the actual rejection next time.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            Original is anything but sharp, but the image you posted doesn't really have any compression issues I can see. Better if you post a link to the actual rejection next time.
            Thanks,this is the rejected image:
            ​​​​​​https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11376881
            I didn't post it because others cannot open it..

            Comment


            • #51
              4 phoographs from Nairobi and Ibom Air this morning at Accra. Any feedback is appreciated! Thanks

              Ibom Air
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0755.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	486.1 KB
ID:	1172881

              Kenya Airways arriving
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0055.jpg
Views:	92
Size:	566.2 KB
ID:	1172882

              Daallo, very early monring shot
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0017.jpg
Views:	95
Size:	671.6 KB
ID:	1172883

              United Nations parked
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0375.jpg
Views:	94
Size:	694.5 KB
ID:	1172884

              Kenya Airways taxi-ing
              Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9891.jpg
Views:	91
Size:	518.8 KB
ID:	1172885

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by sanderzwart View Post
                4 phoographs from Nairobi and Ibom Air this morning at Accra. Any feedback is appreciated!
                1. borderline color/compression
                2. soft, borderline compression
                3. soft/heat hazed
                4. borderline color/oversharpened
                5. soft, color, compression

                Comment


                • #53
                  Would any of these be acceptable?

                  Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0191.jpg Views:	0 Size:	539.8 KB ID:	1173096
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8767.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	431.5 KB
ID:	1173097
                  Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0036.jpg Views:	0 Size:	567.8 KB ID:	1173093
                  Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0316.jpg Views:	0 Size:	611.3 KB ID:	1173094
                  Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_9661.jpg Views:	0 Size:	638.6 KB ID:	1173095
                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    I tried NBO airport before and the current picture in FR needs replacement...

                    Really tricky as it is a circular building and lot of obstruction in the middle. Would this one be acceptable?

                    Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0433-1.jpg Views:	0 Size:	763.1 KB ID:	1173099

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by sanderzwart View Post
                      Would any of these be acceptable?
                      1-2 might have a decent chance, the others are soft/heat hazed.

                      Originally posted by sanderzwart View Post
                      I tried NBO airport before and the current picture in FR needs replacement...

                      Really tricky as it is a circular building and lot of obstruction in the middle. Would this one be acceptable?
                      Very much doubt it.​

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9935-1.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	468.7 KB
ID:	1173937 Would these three of 5Y-SIR qualify for JP? Thanks for the support

                        Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0003.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	437.7 KB
ID:	1173932Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0013.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	489.0 KB
ID:	1173936

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by sanderzwart View Post
                          Would these three of 5Y-SIR qualify for JP? Thanks for the support
                          1. soft/blurry, color, contrast
                          2-3. similar

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            this one was rejected for soft and color:

                            JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                            I appealed, but i think it was rejected. Since a few weeks I don't receive emails anymore with appeal results, whether rejected or accepted. This means i can't see the feedback from reviewers...

                            Is the below better and acceptable for JP? Really, it is sharp and I reduced colors. Taken at miidday, tropical conditions, and sun straight at 90 degrees.

                            Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_0934-5.jpg Views:	0 Size:	471.5 KB ID:	1174678

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by sanderzwart View Post
                              this one was rejected for soft and color:

                              JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!


                              I appealed, but i think it was rejected. Since a few weeks I don't receive emails anymore with appeal results, whether rejected or accepted. This means i can't see the feedback from reviewers...

                              Is the below better and acceptable for JP? Really, it is sharp and I reduced colors. Taken at miidday, tropical conditions, and sun straight at 90 degrees.
                              Appeal was rejected.

                              Comments with appeal: "I agree with the rejection."

                              New version still soft/blurry and blue tint.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                thanks for the feedback. My last try for this Rwandair:

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0934.jpg
Views:	57
Size:	452.8 KB
ID:	1174825

                                And feedback on these three jets would be appreciated:

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0128-10.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	434.8 KB
ID:	1174826Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0623.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	463.3 KB
ID:	1174827Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_0320.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	461.2 KB
ID:	1174828Would this runway should be acceptable for JP?

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_9400-1.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	517.1 KB
ID:	1174829

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X