If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
[/url]
Where is this blurry? I think the 1024px hides any form of blurriness pretty well, and I ran it through topaz. The reg may appear blurry but it is a 3D effect with the font
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Where is this blurry? I think the 1024px hides any form of blurriness pretty well, and I ran it through topaz. The reg may appear blurry but it is a 3D effect with the font
Ah ok, thank you for clarifying. Could you prescreen these please? For the red heli, the obstruction was unavoidable as it was driven in, and for the last head on blue 407, both of them are pilots, so should it avoid the motive rejection?
1. oversharpened, contrast
2. borderline blurry
3. ok for me
4. soft, backlit
5. soft, overexposed
Ah ok, thank you for clarifying. Could you prescreen these please? For the red heli, the obstruction was unavoidable as it was driven in, and for the last head on blue 407, both of them are pilots, so should it avoid the motive rejection?
I tried again, got rejected for the same contrast reason. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11646694
Still too little? Do you think it has a chance of being fixable given the rarity of a civil uh-60a still in the military paint? Or is it worth to appeal this reject?
I think you misunderstood - poor contrast due to cloudiness/hazy light is not usually something you can fix by simply adding or subtracting contrast. Since it's an aesthetic thing, there's not a specific way to technically correct it. You can try adjustments, but I can't say "add/remove this much contrast to get it accepted".
I tried again, got rejected for the same contrast reason. https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11646694
Still too little? Do you think it has a chance of being fixable given the rarity of a civil uh-60a still in the military paint? Or is it worth to appeal this reject?
Hi, I got this rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11505239
Thanks to the screener for explaining the bad post processing part, but you could let me know if it is too much or too little contrast?
Thank you
Contrast too harsh and too much noise reduction. Should also be soft/blurry.
Hi, I got this rejection https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11505239
Thanks to the screener for explaining the bad post processing part, but you could let me know if it is too much or too little contrast?
Thank you
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Leave a comment: