If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
It's been a while since I have posted here and I feel like my editing may be a bit rusty for the queue standards.
Glad if any of the screeners could give me their opinion on this pics.
Thanks in advance
It's been a while since I have posted here and I feel like my editing may be a bit rusty for the queue standards.
Glad if any of the screeners could give me their opinion on this pics.
1. soft/heat hazed
2-3. oversharpened/heat haze
4-5. too far
I kinda expected heat haze on 2 and 3, so glad to confirm it before wasting time and slots in the queue. Would 4 and 5 be acceptable with a tighter crop or is there any other issue?
Moving on, yesterday I got this rejection for "Too much or too little contrast" (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11004264), which surprised me as I thought the photo looked very similar to this one that I previously got accepted in the database (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10933121). Just wanted to know if its worth the appeal or if I should reduce shadows/blacks (think that could be the problem) and try again in the queue.
Moving on, yesterday I got this rejection for "Too much or too little contrast" (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11004264), which surprised me as I thought the photo looked very similar to this one that I previously got accepted in the database (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10933121). Just wanted to know if its worth the appeal or if I should reduce shadows/blacks (think that could be the problem) and try again in the queue.
Borderline but acceptable for me. Appeal chances would probably be less than 50%.
Also added the new one for the rejection to check if it's ok now.
1-2. sharpening could be an issue on both. not sure if it's editing or the quality that's the issue.
3. don't see a huge difference, but this one would also be ok for me
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment