roeo - prescreening request / editing advice

[roeo]

It's been a while since I have posted here and I feel like my editing may be a bit rusty for the queue standards.
Glad if any of the screeners could give me their opinion on this pics.
Thanks in advance

[David Tweddle]

I'm not a screener, but they do look good.

[dlowwa]

It's been a while since I have posted here and I feel like my editing may be a bit rusty for the queue standards.
Glad if any of the screeners could give me their opinion on this pics.

1. borderline contrast/overprocessed
2. soft
3. vignetting/overprocessed
4. soft, dark/contrast
5. vignetting/overprocessed

[roeo]

Still trying to get to grips with the editing, grateful if any screener could give its opinion on this ones. Thanks!

[dlowwa]

Still trying to get to grips with the editing, grateful if any screener could give its opinion on this ones.

1-2. backlit
3-5. ok for me

[roeo]

Need some opinion with this new ones. Thanks for the help once more.

[dlowwa]

Need some opinion with this new ones. Thanks for the help once more.

1. centering, contrast, borderline soft
2. heat hazed
3. blurry/oversharpened
4. heat hazed
5. ok for me

[roeo]

1. centering, contrast, borderline soft
2. heat hazed
3. blurry/oversharpened
4. heat hazed
5. ok for me

Thanks, would 1 and 3 be fixable?? Also, I don't really understand what is the meaning of borderline and how to fix it

[dlowwa]

Thanks, would 1 and 3 be fixable?? Also, I don't really understand what is the meaning of borderline and how to fix it

Borderline = may or may not be a problem.

Blurry is usually not fixable.

[roeo]

Hi everyone, got some concerns with the following photos. Thanks for your help.

[dlowwa]

Hi everyone, got some concerns with the following photos. Thanks for your help.

1. soft/heat hazed
2-3. oversharpened/heat haze
4-5. too far

[roeo]

1. soft/heat hazed
2-3. oversharpened/heat haze
4-5. too far

I kinda expected heat haze on 2 and 3, so glad to confirm it before wasting time and slots in the queue. Would 4 and 5 be acceptable with a tighter crop or is there any other issue?

Moving on, yesterday I got this rejection for "Too much or too little contrast" (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11004264), which surprised me as I thought the photo looked very similar to this one that I previously got accepted in the database (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10933121). Just wanted to know if its worth the appeal or if I should reduce shadows/blacks (think that could be the problem) and try again in the queue.

Thanks for your time once more!

[dlowwa]

Would 4 and 5 be acceptable with a tighter crop or is there any other issue?

Not going to speculate without seeing what you plan to upload.

Moving on, yesterday I got this rejection for "Too much or too little contrast" (https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11004264), which surprised me as I thought the photo looked very similar to this one that I previously got accepted in the database (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10933121). Just wanted to know if its worth the appeal or if I should reduce shadows/blacks (think that could be the problem) and try again in the queue.

Borderline but acceptable for me. Appeal chances would probably be less than 50%.

[roeo]

Not going to speculate without seeing what you plan to upload.

No problem, this would be the newest edits.

Also added the new one for the rejection to check if it's ok now.

[dlowwa]

No problem, this would be the newest edits.

Also added the new one for the rejection to check if it's ok now.

1-2. sharpening could be an issue on both. not sure if it's editing or the quality that's the issue.
3. don't see a huge difference, but this one would also be ok for me