Benjamin Vegstein - Editing Advice

[Benjamin Vegstein]

The Norwegians on approach need mid tones adjustment - You can see in the histogram that mid tones are overexposed. Just adjust the middle tones as in the image (to the right) and the image would be much better.

Okay, thanks for all the help and advice! Have a great rest of your day/night.

[jakerepp]

How come this got in?

At least half of the tail has light to it.

[Alex - Spot-This !]

The Norwegians on approach need mid tones adjustment - You can see in the histogram that mid tones are overexposed. Just adjust the middle tones as in the image (to the right) and the image would be much better.

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Tip of the stab is cut. Either crop more or keep it fully in. The histogram confirms the strong underexposure.

[Benjamin Vegstein]

I just had a look at your rejections, can't wait to see which ones you consider as shitty and screener's fault.

Now about the original post. A little bit of respect and humility would definitely be great, specially for people giving you their time for free...

Kind Regards
Alex

PS : it's only one REJECTED appeal per 24h, if it gets accepted you can appeal again. Also starting your appeal with "This is ridiculous! I find this reason for reject totally wrong! " won't get you anywhere, please read carefully : https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...hen-you-appeal - And finally to help you understand that rejection you appealed. Just check the tail, there's no direct light on it which means it was slightly backlit, resulting in a poor contrast. It was a very valid rejection.

How come this got in?

[Benjamin Vegstein]

Reason(s):

• Dark / Underexposed
• Part of aircraft cut off

Reason(s):

• Overexposed

Reason(s):

• Overexposed

Sorry for being rude, it was not intended that way.

[Benjamin Vegstein]

I just had a look at your rejections, can't wait to see which ones you consider as shitty and screener's fault.

Now about the original post. A little bit of respect and humility would definitely be great, specially for people giving you their time for free...

Kind Regards
Alex

PS : it's only one REJECTED appeal per 24h, if it gets accepted you can appeal again. Also starting your appeal with "This is ridiculous! I find this reason for reject totally wrong! " won't get you anywhere, please read carefully : https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...hen-you-appeal - And finally to help you understand that rejection you appealed. Just check the tail, there's no direct light on it which means it was slightly backlit, resulting in a poor contrast. It was a very valid rejection.

Okay, I will make sure of the respect!

[Alex - Spot-This !]

I just had a look at your rejections, can't wait to see which ones you consider as shitty and screener's fault.

Now about the original post. A little bit of respect and humility would definitely be great, specially for people giving you their time for free...

Kind Regards
Alex

PS : it's only one REJECTED appeal per 24h, if it gets accepted you can appeal again. Also starting your appeal with "This is ridiculous! I find this reason for reject totally wrong! " won't get you anywhere, please read carefully : https://forums.jetphotos.com/forum/a...hen-you-appeal - And finally to help you understand that rejection you appealed. Just check the tail, there's no direct light on it which means it was slightly backlit, resulting in a poor contrast. It was a very valid rejection.

[Benjamin Vegstein]

Yeah the reason you can only appeal once every 24 hours is so you can't abuse the appeal feature. Part of it is to encourage participation here in the forum. Post the rejections here and let Dana and others review them for you.

But calling the process 'shitty' and saying the rejections are 'the screeners fault' isn't going to get you very far. I don't think you have any grounds to file a complaint about the screener, nor is there any way to do so. Just post the rejections here and wait for someone to review them and give you their thoughts.

Okay, thanks for the answer!

I'll get them posted soon.

[jakerepp]

I would like to know if there is something I can do to make it go faster?

Maybe file a complaint about the screener?

Something in that genra.

Yeah the reason you can only appeal once every 24 hours is so you can't abuse the appeal feature. Part of it is to encourage participation here in the forum. Post the rejections here and let Dana and others review them for you.

But calling the process 'shitty' and saying the rejections are 'the screeners fault' isn't going to get you very far. I don't think you have any grounds to file a complaint about the screener, nor is there any way to do so. Just post the rejections here and wait for someone to review them and give you their thoughts.

[Benjamin Vegstein]

You might want to start over.

What advice are you looking for?

I would like to know if there is something I can do to make it go faster?

Maybe file a complaint about the screener?

Something in that genra.

[jakerepp]

Hello!

I just had five ridiculous rejects and I just found out that I can only apeal one picture each 24 hours. From my prior uploading experience I know that the rejects are false and I think it's really shitty, that you have to wait 24 hours to apeal each picture when this was the screeners fault! Any advice? Thanks in advance.

-Benjamin

You might want to start over.

What advice are you looking for?

[Benjamin Vegstein]

Hello!

I just had five ridiculous rejects and I just found out that I can only apeal one picture each 24 hours. From my prior uploading experience I know that the rejects are false and I think it's really shitty, that you have to wait 24 hours to apeal each picture when this was the screeners fault! Any advice? Thanks in advance.

-Benjamin