Thomas Harding - editing advice

[Thomas Harding]

Hello, following the rejection of these two photos I uploaded, would it be worth appealing? Thanks.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11750584

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11750496

[dlowwa]

Hello, following the rejection of these two photos I uploaded, would it be worth appealing? Thanks.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11750584

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11750496

They're ok for me, but that doesn't guarantee success at appeal.

[Thomas Harding]

Hello, may I have a pre-screen on these 3, thanks.

[dlowwa]

Hello, may I have a pre-screen on these 3, thanks.

Soft, dark.

[Thomas Harding]

Hello, may I have these 2 pre-screened? Thanks. Main concerns are the window glare on pic 1 and the grass on pic 2.

[dlowwa]

Hello, may I have these 2 pre-screened? Thanks. Main concerns are the window glare on pic 1 and the grass on pic 2.

1. soft, contrast, color
2. soft, borderline contrast

[Thomas Harding]

Hello, would it be worth appealing this? Thanks.

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11892164

[dlowwa]

Hello, would it be worth appealing this? Thanks.

No. Looks more like noise than compression. Also soft.

[Thomas Harding]

Hello, may I have these pre-screened? Thanks. Curious to know whether birds count as obstruction/clutter or if an exception can be made.

[dlowwa]

Hello, may I have these pre-screened? Thanks. Curious to know whether birds count as obstruction/clutter or if an exception can be made.

1. soft/blurry, color
2. borderline soft

[Thomas Harding]

Hello, may I have these 2 pre-screened, thanks.

[dlowwa]

Hello, may I have these 2 pre-screened, thanks.

1. borderline dark/harsh contrast
2. ok for me

[Thomas Harding]

Hello, may I have these 2 pre-screened, Thanks. Both are 1920 px and wondering if they are up to standards or need to drop to 1600 maybe.

[dlowwa]

Hello, may I have these 2 pre-screened, Thanks. Both are 1920 px and wondering if they are up to standards or need to drop to 1600 maybe.

1. soft/blurry/heat hazed, dark
2. soft

[Thomas Harding]

1. soft/blurry/heat hazed, dark
2. soft

Do you reckon that lowering to 1600 px will hide these imperfections, at least the soft/blurry/heat hazed part?