Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TRTPUwU - editing/prescreening advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • yes 2 and 3 are similar.
    https://www.jetphotos.com/photographer/371941

    Comment


    • In that case can someone prescreen 1 and 2
      Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
      If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
      ——————————————————————————

      Comment


      • Originally posted by TRTPUwU View Post
        Hi, requesting a prescreen on this new reg, and are 2 and 3 similar?
        1. soft, blurry, noisy, compression, horizon
        2. soft, noisy, compression

        Both very poor, will not comment on them again.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by cyhz.spotter

          1 and 2 are still similar I suggest you read the guidelines on similar photos.
          They are not similar, so perhaps you should avoid giving advice unless you are absolutely certain.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

            They are not similar, so perhaps you should avoid giving advice unless you are absolutely certain.
            Are they not? They were taken seconds appart. Or does the angle make them different? And what about the 3rd? Is it OK (it is probably not, but what problems does it have?)
            Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
            If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
            ——————————————————————————

            Comment


            • Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

              1. soft, blurry, noisy, compression, horizon
              2. soft, noisy, compression

              Both very poor, will not comment on them again.
              Well, it is what it is, after all, i was about 20 feet of it while lift off, so i was concerned about blurriness, also, can i ask what website/editor do you use to resize with, to avoid compression issues?
              Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
              If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
              ——————————————————————————

              Comment


              • Originally posted by TRTPUwU View Post

                Well, it is what it is, after all, i was about 20 feet of it while lift off, so i was concerned about blurriness, also, can i ask what website/editor do you use to resize with, to avoid compression issues?
                Photoshop, but that compression doesn't look like the result of poor resizing; it looks like a poor quality camera sensor, or else something that is badly overprocessed - but I'd guess the former. What kind of camera is it?

                Comment


                • A cannon power shot G5, from anywhere from 2005 to 1995, so i am also thinking about the camera sensor. Although i did manage to get photos almost in (they were “backlit”) without compression issues. But i think it is time for a new camera, suited for JP., or i could buy a phone with a good enough camera (iphone 15 or samsung s23). But i think a camera will be better.
                  Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_4497.jpg Views:	0 Size:	732.2 KB ID:	1182544
                  Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
                  If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
                  ——————————————————————————

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by TRTPUwU View Post
                    A cannon power shot G5, from anywhere from 2005 to 1995
                    Yeah, that's almost certainly your issue right there.

                    Comment


                    • Hi, requesting a prescreen.
                      Main concerns: sharpness and noise (i dont know if i overused the noise reduction function or if it still needs noise reduction.)
                      1-spotting location
                      2-airport photo (is it ramp or airport overview?)
                      3-first reg
                      4,5-first reg
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4580.jpg
Views:	168
Size:	762.8 KB
ID:	1183775
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4578.jpg
Views:	140
Size:	1.10 MB
ID:	1183776
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4586.jpg
Views:	129
Size:	972.4 KB
ID:	1183777
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4585.jpg
Views:	128
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1183778


                      Attached Files
                      Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
                      If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
                      ——————————————————————————

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by TRTPUwU View Post
                        Hi, requesting a prescreen.
                        Main concerns: sharpness and noise (i dont know if i overused the noise reduction function or if it still needs noise reduction.)
                        1-spotting location
                        2-airport photo (is it ramp or airport overview?)
                        3-first reg
                        4,5-first reg
                        Sorry, the quality on all of these is very poor.

                        Comment


                        • I was looking at older shots and decided to try again, requesting a prescreen:
                          I wonder if i overused noise reduction.
                          Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4784.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	794.9 KB
ID:	1184425Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4779.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	741.8 KB
ID:	1184426Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4781.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	852.3 KB
ID:	1184427Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4783.jpg
Views:	79
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1184428
                          Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
                          If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
                          ——————————————————————————

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by TRTPUwU View Post
                            I was looking at older shots and decided to try again, requesting a prescreen:
                            I wonder if i overused noise reduction.
                            Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_4784.jpg Views:	0 Size:	794.9 KB ID:	1184425Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_4779.jpg Views:	0 Size:	741.8 KB ID:	1184426Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_4781.jpg Views:	0 Size:	852.3 KB ID:	1184427Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_4783.jpg Views:	0 Size:	1.06 MB ID:	1184428
                            Also, wondering about this 5th shot, it would be first reg

                            Click image for larger version  Name:	IMG_4819.jpg Views:	0 Size:	616.1 KB ID:	1184507
                            Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
                            If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
                            ——————————————————————————

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by TRTPUwU View Post

                              Also, wondering about this 5th shot, it would be first reg

                              Click image for larger version Name:	IMG_4819.jpg Views:	0 Size:	616.1 KB ID:	1184507
                              Anyone?
                              Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
                              If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
                              ——————————————————————————

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by TRTPUwU View Post
                                I was looking at older shots and decided to try again, requesting a prescreen:
                                I wonder if i overused noise reduction.
                                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4784.jpg
Views:	82
Size:	794.9 KB
ID:	1184425Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4779.jpg
Views:	75
Size:	741.8 KB
ID:	1184426Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4781.jpg
Views:	77
Size:	852.3 KB
ID:	1184427Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4783.jpg
Views:	79
Size:	1.06 MB
ID:	1184428
                                They all look somewhat soft, especially #1 which looks blurry

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X