Tweet
Originally posted by TRTPUwU
View Post
Anyone?
-
Soft/blurry to me
Anyone? -
Re-edit of some of them, if a screener/member could see them:Attached FilesEverything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
——————————————————————————
Comment
-
-
Can someone prescreen the photos above, + this 2 (both ramp)Originally posted by TRTPUwU View PostAttached FilesEverything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
——————————————————————————
Comment
-
-
-
-
I was watching top gear (with clarckson, season 23, the rest is bad), looking through files, and i found this, CC-DJC, a new reg inside of a hangar, a 'rare catch' since it probably comes out once a month and flies locally, but not special at all. Well, requesting a prescreen. (i am worried about the light and contrast, i like it but a screener will probably not)
Attached FilesEverything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
——————————————————————————
Comment
-
-
-
i now put 150 (max) sharpness, and a bit f noise reduction, but i am afraid that i overused nr, and that is making the image soft. (Or heat haze, inside the hangar there was a grill/ barbecue party going on.)Originally posted by dlowwa View Post
I also am stranged about something. The chopper photos that were rejected in both regular and prescreening for compression were taken with the same camera, exported at the same quality and resized with the same settings, could anything be causing compression in the other one?
Attached FilesEverything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
——————————————————————————
Comment
-
-
Soft, noisy/compression/overprocessed. Will not comment on this one again.Originally posted by TRTPUwU View PostComment
-
The beechcraft? Ok, thanks for the helpOriginally posted by dlowwa View Post
Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
——————————————————————————
Comment
-
Hi, requesting a prescreenAttached FilesEverything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
——————————————————————————
Comment
-
-
And also on this oneAttached FilesEverything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
——————————————————————————
Comment
-
-
1. too far, oversharpened, contrast, compression, noisy, horizonOriginally posted by TRTPUwU View Post
2. soft, blurry, noisy, compression, contrast, horizon
Both are very poor and not fixable.
Sorry to be harsh, but how is it you're offering prescreening advice to others but are unable to see that your own images are nowhere near the quality necessary for acceptance?Comment
-
I thought the quality was bad , i just wanted to know what were the issues to see what the problems were, to learn to take photos in a better way and in better conditions (but i did not know that they were that bad). I also am trying to see how much sharpness/NR i have to add to my photos. I will move on from all my older shots, as i am expecting the delivery of a new camera and i will go on a small planespotting trip in april. Thanks to the help on the forum, i dicovered about how much sharpness in LR is under and oversharpening. And how to edit photos in a better way.Originally posted by dlowwa View PostEverything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
——————————————————————————
Comment
-
No worries, it's good that you can use the opportunity to learn - but maybe best to limit your advice to others until you've got your own images up to an acceptable levelOriginally posted by TRTPUwU View Post
Comment
Comment