Again, thanx for the detailed and helpful reply. Hopefully these 2 are (not only borderline) acceptable....
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
bstolle - prescreening request/rejection advice please
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by bstolle View PostAgain, thanx for the detailed and helpful reply. Hopefully these 2 are (not only borderline) acceptable....
2. still a bit soft (it's the tail area that's the problem. you might want to try a different frame if you have one)
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by bstolle View PostAs usual, thank you for your detailed reply Dana. Without it I wouldn't know where to look for further improvement.
Here's another attempt...(and sorry for cluttering your forum with posting the same/similar photos over and over again).
Comment
-
Thanx a lot. Since the first PC-12 upload in this thread was considered as 'borderline harsh contrast', I reduced contrast...too much apparently.
I'll increase it a tad an then I'll try my luck.
Comment
-
Ok, this didn't go as planned since both fotos were rejected.
D-FBWG bad Info: Serial Number/CN. I searched six different, usually very reliable sources, but none has this info, so I left the field blank as required.
D-FCYW invalid hot: This brand new, worlds first 7 blade prop significantly changes the appearance of the PC-12 with it's much bigger and black spinner it's IMO more noticeable than e.g. a new sticker. So did assume that his belongs to #3 of the Hot requirements.
3. Any change to the colour scheme (for example: removal of a special scheme, new stickers) or to the aircraft itself (Winglets, Sharklets) - Note that this is only valid for active aircraft
Does it make sense to appeal?
Thanx in advance
Comment
-
Originally posted by bstolle View PostOk, this didn't go as planned since both fotos were rejected.
D-FBWG bad Info: Serial Number/CN. I searched six different, usually very reliable sources, but none has this info, so I left the field blank as required.
D-FCYW invalid hot: This brand new, worlds first 7 blade prop significantly changes the appearance of the PC-12 with it's much bigger and black spinner it's IMO more noticeable than e.g. a new sticker. So did assume that his belongs to #3 of the Hot requirements.
3. Any change to the colour scheme (for example: removal of a special scheme, new stickers) or to the aircraft itself (Winglets, Sharklets) - Note that this is only valid for active aircraft
Does it make sense to appeal?
Thanx in advance
Comment
-
Checked, thanx, and what can I do concerning D-FBWG's SN?
Comment
-
I did use this number and it was finally accepted! Thank you for your patience and continuos support and help Dana. Highly appreciated.
But the questions remains; What to do if there's no SN available? I haven't seen the SN being painted onto civil aircraft before and it actually isn't a real prove that this is a SN at all.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Thanx again, but the DA50 has been rejected for the Horizon not being level. Rechecked the picture but the vertical lines are truly vertical, and the runway in the background is level.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bstolle View PostThanx again, but the DA50 has been rejected for the Horizon not being level. Rechecked the picture but the vertical lines are truly vertical, and the runway in the background is level.
Comment
-
The DA50 does have a rather unusual slight nose down appearance on ground. This is most likely an contributing factor for the impression that a CCW rotation is required. Anyway, here are the final two for the next few weeks until my queue is empty again.
edit: in case the first one is considered backlit, I've included a second one.
Comment
Comment