Originally posted by bstolle
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
bstolle - prescreening request/rejection advice please
Collapse
X
-
Looks like it was good enough this time. It's online, almost a month after my first attempt. 😂
Weather permitting I'll try of course to make better ones if lighting conditions are improving in a few weeks.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by bstolle View PostThank you, Dana. It's difficult for me to find the balance between being too soft and having too much aliasing effect....here's the next attempt.
2. ok for me
Main issue for you is the softness is not even distributed across the frame, so sharpening the whole frame to compensate for the are of softness can often lead to the other areas then being oversharpened. OE-VDM the tail area is quite soft, but the rest not so much. Uneven sharpness across the frame is a common problem, due to lens issues, DOF, motion blur, etc..
Comment
-
Slightly improved the first one (found an optional way of additional sharpening) and it's already online, with a its new to the database operator.
Besides the points you have mentioned, the close distance to the airplanes doesn't exactly help with DOF and the high angular veloctiy doesn't help either.
Here are 3 new ones. Would the C90 one count as HOT, due to the completely missing engine cowlings? I've never seen an engine run under these conditions.
Thanx in advance as usual. Btw. due to your precise feedback, my acceptance rate has increased to 100%. 🙂
Edit:
It looks like if a new aircraft uses a registration which has been previously in use by a de-registered aircraft, it should get the 'first registration' badge.
In this case, could I get this badge for OE-FAP and OE-VPU? Thank you.
OE-FAP | Diamond DA-42 Twin Star | Aviation Together | bernt stolle | JetPhotos
OE-VPU | Diamond DA-50C | Diamond Aircraft Industries | bernt stolle | JetPhotos
First registration badge missing - JetPhotos Forums - The Friendly Way to Fly
Comment
-
Originally posted by bstolle View PostSlightly improved the first one (found an optional way of additional sharpening) and it's already online, with a its new to the database operator.
Besides the points you have mentioned, the close distance to the airplanes doesn't exactly help with DOF and the high angular veloctiy doesn't help either.
Here are 3 new ones. Would the C90 one count as HOT, due to the completely missing engine cowlings? I've never seen an engine run under these conditions.
2. ok for me
Comment
-
Just re-read the guidlines about obstructions..Looks like I don't understand. There's nothing obstructing the view onto any part of the C90.
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Thank you. I could of course 'fake' a better viz, but this would ruin the ambient lighting / fog condition and decrease the nav and landing lights brightness.
Another question is, would it be 'fixable' by increasing contrast. I've made a version with higher contrast already, but the mood gets lost of course.
Comment
-
Thanx a lot. 🙂Just exchanged it (with a heavy heart) with a slightly higher contrast version.
Comment
Comment