Tweet
Originally posted by Leoanrd Damm
View Post
-
Could you send an image of the Equalised version -
I don't know how I can send thatComment
-
Hi,Originally posted by Leoanrd Damm View PostHi guys, can anyone help me to find out why these three photos got rejected?
I am especially confused about link 1 and 3
Kind Regards
1. have editing halos. try to move less highlights&shadows.
2 and 3. Poor contrast due overcast conditions. not fixable.Comment
-
Alright, thank you for your help!Comment
-
Hi guys, I hope everyone is having a great day. Two days ago this photo got rejected: https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=11637189 for having dirt/window glare and being overprocessed. I think this photo got wrongly rejected, because there is no dirt and I don't see anything that is overprocessed. I understand that people might think that this is dirt, but that are actually clouds which got lit up by the full moon on that evening. The white line above the tower is no window glare or reflection as I wasn't shooting through a window. That white line is a CRJ approaching Frankfurt. After making sure, that there really isn't any dirt or anything overprocessed, I wrote an appeal. After waiting for two days, I got the message that it is correctly rejected but got no detailed information why. As I know, that the JP Crew is very busy, I obviously don't want to ask for a specific reason with another appeal as this is not the right thing to do.
All in all I think this is just a misunderstanding and that is why I want to ask in the forum for any help and maybe someone can tell me where the dirt and overprocessing is visible
Kind RegardsComment
-
Hi Leo,
If I may give you my opinion, initially upon opening the image I go "wayyy to much colors here". Night shooting under airport artificial lighting is difficult as the auto white balance renders weird color casts. This here is away from this and thus the fuselage should be properly white not magenta and the tail should be blue not purple. I guess the screener was seeing that the shot's colors were just "too much" (sorry for not being more technical as I'm not a screener myself). As for the dirt, if equalised I see above the tail something which looks like remains from sensor cleaning (not a dust spot but some sort of dried up cleaning fluid). This could be seen as "dirt".
For proper advice I suggest you post the picture in original and edited version to your prescreening thread so that you could get comments on the next attempt. It's ususally not worth to discuss already rejected shots but - if you're eager to get it in - try again. Best of success with that..Comment
-
Hi, thank you so much for your help I get your point with the colors, but shouldn't the photo get rejected for 6.1 Bad Color (Over/Under Saturation, Hue) or is that counted to the photo for being overprocessed?
Regarding your point with dried up cleaning fluid, I can say that I have not used any cleaning fluid for sensor cleaning. I would love to get that photo on to my account, as it is one of my favourite airplanes. I just hope that someone finds out what the exact point of the rejection is, so I could fix it for the next time..
Comment
-
As I think that I can ask further questions and ask for editing advice in this thread now, does anyone have a clue why my photo ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=11637189 ) got rejected?
Kind RegardsComment
-
Overprocessed: Too much noise reduction.Originally posted by Leoanrd Damm View PostAs I think that I can ask further questions and ask for editing advice in this thread now, does anyone have a clue why my photo ( https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=11637189 ) got rejected?
Kind Regards
Glare/Dirt: Glare from the lights.Comment
-
Hi dlowwa, I get the point regarding the overprocessing now, but I still don't get the point with the 'Glare from the lights' . Which lights do you mean? This is just a normal thing that happens at night. I didn't shoot through glass. How is it possible to get rid of the reflections?
Comment
-
Shorter exposure, different angle, different aperture, lens filter..lots of things you can do.Originally posted by Leoanrd Damm View PostHow is it possible to get rid of the reflections?Comment
-
But where is the problem with the reflections? I don't know of a rule that forbids normal reflections from lights of an airplane. Do you mean the reflection on the front light? Sorry for asking so many questions, but I want to understand the rejection, to do it better in the future
Comment
-
One or two glaring lights are fine to most screeners (for what i see in the database) but there are too many bright glaring lightsOriginally posted by Leoanrd Damm View PostBut where is the problem with the reflections? I don't know of a rule that forbids normal reflections from lights of an airplane. Do you mean the reflection on the front light? Sorry for asking so many questions, but I want to understand the rejection, to do it better in the future
Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
——————————————————————————
Comment
-
Subjective decision based on how distracting the glare is. Here it was determined to be too distracting.Originally posted by Leoanrd Damm View PostBut where is the problem with the reflections? I don't know of a rule that forbids normal reflections from lights of an airplane. Do you mean the reflection on the front light? Sorry for asking so many questions, but I want to understand the rejection, to do it better in the futureComment
-
Hi guys, I just wanted to clarify why this photo got rejected https://www.jetphotos.com/viewreject_b.php?id=11655681 , because I thought it is allowed to upload two photos of the same plane from different sides, different background and different angle. And because it is probably my second last photo of that plane ever, I would have loved to get it uploaded..
Kind Regards
Comment
Comment