Pre Screning Request - MD11aviationfan

[md11aviationfan]

Hi, can someone tell me where in the image this is soft?

https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11663664

Thanks in advance

[dlowwa]

Thanks, very much ill watch out next time. But if i Add Buisness Jet too is this right?
And btw can you please tell me if the contrast is better now.

Borderline but acceptable for me.

[md11aviationfan]

Thanks, very much ill watch out next time. But if i Add Buisness Jet too is this right?
And btw can you please tell me if the contrast is better now.

[dlowwa]

Hello, i would like to know why this photo has Bad info / categories wrong or missing. I can understand the contrast stuff but im unsure if i did select anything wrong:
(https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11652613) this is the rejected one

The difference between the 0001 and 0002 cant be seen on the aircraft. But as the 98-0002 was the first one to appear on radar after takeoff, then followed by the 98-0001. Based on that and that it was the first of them i photographed i think that this is 98-0002. after this one in the photo taked off the other 757 rolled in and the 98-0002 appeared on radar a few kilometres away on the airport while the 0001 was still on the runway. Also cant be 99-0003 cause it went to the northern Runway.

This is also backed by this photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11253254 Which has 16:39 as exif time which is only a few seconds difference to mine.

As for the Categories rejection i selected Night cause when you filter by the night category you can find a lot of sunset photos which this is clearly taken in.
Maybe the Buisness jet category i could have added but i was unsure cause it is not really a BBJ

Bad info is bad info about the aircraft and categories is only for the categories
Would like to know if im thinking completely wrong or the screener did something wrong.

This is a military aircraft, not civilian. Night Shot needed.

[md11aviationfan]

Hello, i would like to know why this photo has Bad info / categories wrong or missing. I can understand the contrast stuff but im unsure if i did select anything wrong:
(https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=11652613) this is the rejected one

The difference between the 0001 and 0002 cant be seen on the aircraft. But as the 98-0002 was the first one to appear on radar after takeoff, then followed by the 98-0001. Based on that and that it was the first of them i photographed i think that this is 98-0002. after this one in the photo taked off the other 757 rolled in and the 98-0002 appeared on radar a few kilometres away on the airport while the 0001 was still on the runway. Also cant be 99-0003 cause it went to the northern Runway.

This is also backed by this photo: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11253254 Which has 16:39 as exif time which is only a few seconds difference to mine.

As for the Categories rejection i selected Night cause when you filter by the night category you can find a lot of sunset photos which this is clearly taken in.
Maybe the Buisness jet category i could have added but i was unsure cause it is not really a BBJ

Bad info is bad info about the aircraft and categories is only for the categories
Would like to know if im thinking completely wrong or the screener did something wrong.

[dlowwa]

Hello, is the sharpness better now? i reduced the aggressivenes of the noise reduction and added more sharpnes

No, still looks soft/blurry.

Original with Standard 40 Sharpening then downscaled to 720p

Downscaled = not the original.

[md11aviationfan]

Original with Standard 40 Sharpening then downscaled to 720p

[md11aviationfan]

Hello, is the sharpness better now? i reduced the aggressivenes of the noise reduction and added more sharpnes

[md11aviationfan]

The originial is pretty sharp but taking at a bit higher iso but i couldnt use a tripod due to the weird location

[dlowwa]

So is it fixeable?

Crop might be, but the quality I couldn't really say without knowing how soft/blurry the original is.

[md11aviationfan]

Ok, yeah the crop had to be a bit tight cause otherwise would be stuff covering it. Really wanted to get a shot of this rare A310. So is it fixeable?

[dlowwa]

Hi,
I would like to ask whether this kind of Close-up is acceptable. I would really hope this motive is acceptable and if there are other fixeable mistakes you can also mention them.

Close-ups are ok, but this crop is a bit awkward. Image is also soft/blurry.

[md11aviationfan]

Hi,
I would like to ask whether this kind of Close-up is acceptable. I would really hope this motive is acceptable and if there are other fixeable mistakes you can also mention them.