Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

hugolam (Rejection enquiry)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by hugolam View Post
    Would appreciate if any screeners could shed a light on whether the crop on this image is acceptable or not. Thanks
    A bit awkward. Either crop tighter of leave the whole wing in.

    Leave a comment:


  • hugolam
    replied
    Would appreciate if any screeners could shed a light on whether the crop on this image is acceptable or not. Thanks
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by hugolam View Post
    This is RAW +JPEG.
    Ok..but which of those two is the above image from?

    Originally posted by hugolam View Post
    I'm still a novice to photography, so would you recommend shooting RAW only? And if so, do you think this will solve the issue as discussed above ?
    I'd recommend you learn the difference between the two (or more) options so you can decide which best fits your needs.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam_F
    replied
    I experienced it too. (Canon EOS R6 Mk II + RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM+1.4x)
    The image quality is not high enough to upload to JP, but for reference.


    When I checked the original image, it did not appear when shooting with jpeg,
    but it seems that it sometimes appears when editing lens correction (peripheral illumination, etc.) when shooting RAW. 

    jpeg,

    The vignetting is severe.

    Edit with RAW shooting

    Please try to reference.




    Leave a comment:


  • hugolam
    replied
    This is RAW +JPEG. I'm still a novice to photography, so would you recommend shooting RAW only? And if so, do you think this will solve the issue as discussed above ?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by hugolam View Post
    Hi Dana, unfortunately this effect is present without me doing any editing. Any ideas of the cause if not caused by editing?
    This is definitely software editing, if not from you, then in-camera. I assume you're shooting jpegs and not RAW?

    Leave a comment:


  • hugolam
    replied
    Hi Dana, unfortunately this effect is present without me doing any editing. Any ideas of the cause if not caused by editing?

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by hugolam View Post
    Having some issues lately with getting these rectangular shaped things and halos under the dust scan and I don't know what they are. Initially thought it was an editing issue but they appear in un-edited images as well. So seems like it's a camera issue, anyone know what the cause is and how to fix it ? I've attached an example below as reference
    Interesting effect. Probably related to highlight reductions, so check s/h tool, clarity, dehaze, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • hugolam
    replied
    Having some issues lately with getting these rectangular shaped things and halos under the dust scan and I don't know what they are. Initially thought it was an editing issue but they appear in un-edited images as well. So seems like it's a camera issue, anyone know what the cause is and how to fix it ? I've attached an example below as reference

    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • dlowwa
    replied
    Originally posted by hugolam View Post
    Have been getting a lot more contrast rejections than usual lately and I'd like to understand why. The photo attached below was rejected for soft and contrast. I don't think it's that soft, but this is subjective and I can accept that. But the contrast rejection just confuses me, as there is clearly sufficient lighting on the aircraft. If any screener could shed some light on this I would appreciate it.
    A little soft, but not terribly so. Noticeable especially towards the tail. Contrast is a little weak. Should be fixable.

    Leave a comment:


  • neto.911
    replied
    Originally posted by hugolam View Post
    Have been getting a lot more contrast rejections than usual lately and I'd like to understand why. The photo attached below was rejected for soft and contrast. I don't think it's that soft, but this is subjective and I can accept that. But the contrast rejection just confuses me, as there is clearly sufficient lighting on the aircraft. If any screener could shed some light on this I would appreciate it.
    It is necessary to understand that JP prefers more strong contrast photos. It's not quite that, but I'm simplifying you to understand. So what would it cost for a little more contrast in this photo?

    Leave a comment:


  • hugolam
    started a topic hugolam (Rejection enquiry)

    hugolam (Rejection enquiry)

    Have been getting a lot more contrast rejections than usual lately and I'd like to understand why. The photo attached below was rejected for soft and contrast. I don't think it's that soft, but this is subjective and I can accept that. But the contrast rejection just confuses me, as there is clearly sufficient lighting on the aircraft. If any screener could shed some light on this I would appreciate it.
    Attached Files
Working...
X