Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prescreening request/processing advice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Prescreening request/processing advice

    Can someone please have a look at this picture, I have tried uploading it countless times and it keeps getting rejected for different reasons, it seems to be one step forward and two steps backwards, where every time I solve one problem another arises, it also keeps saying too soft even though I've maxed the sharpness in lightroom, (My camera isn't the best but still), and it keeps saying information incorrect, I can't autofill because this would be the first picture of this plane. I'm near certain the info is right, so some guidance on what I'm getting wrong would also be nice.



    Click image for larger version

Name:	MC-130J 5937 (2) V7.jpg
Views:	240
Size:	270.0 KB
ID:	1188310








    Attached Files

  • #2
    Not a screener, but it would help if you can share what reasons were given for the reject?
    At the first impression it looks ok, I might have give some more contrast and it could be slightly higher in frame. However, it looks like you possibly merged the layers in the wrong way? The edges of the aircraft look oversharpened.
    If you need the correct sereal...it shall be 20-5937, a MC-130J.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by nashwa View Post
      Can someone please have a look at this picture, I have tried uploading it countless times and it keeps getting rejected for different reasons, it seems to be one step forward and two steps backwards, where every time I solve one problem another arises, it also keeps saying too soft even though I've maxed the sharpness in lightroom, (My camera isn't the best but still), and it keeps saying information incorrect, I can't autofill because this would be the first picture of this plane. I'm near certain the info is right, so some guidance on what I'm getting wrong would also be nice.
      Somewhat soft/flat contrast, but should be fixable with a better edit. Can't comment on info unless I know how you uploaded it.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

        Somewhat soft/flat contrast, but should be fixable with a better edit. Can't comment on info unless I know how you uploaded it.
        MC-130J, reg. 20-5937, c/n. 382-5937, the c/n is the only thing I'm not fully sold on, but literally every other MC-130J is 382-last 4 digits of the reg, so I'm pretty sure it's right.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by AKH View Post
          Not a screener, but it would help if you can share what reasons were given for the reject?
          At the first impression it looks ok, I might have give some more contrast and it could be slightly higher in frame. However, it looks like you possibly merged the layers in the wrong way? The edges of the aircraft look oversharpened.
          If you need the correct sereal...it shall be 20-5937, a MC-130J.
          • Over Processed / Bad postprocessing
          • Undersharpened (Soft)
          • JPG compression artefacts
          • Categories wrong or missing
          ​I don't get the compression, I saved it in the highest quality, so it shouldn't be compressed in any way, I don't really understand the wrong categories, maybe it isn't information but the fact i labelled it as a hot photo, but theres no other pictures of 20-5937 on jp so it counts as hot right?

          Comment


          • #6
            The c/n is correct according to some databases.
            Category: Genre must be military and the C-130 needs category CARGO aircraft
            The others shall be fixable, as Dana said, but you shall start again from the original; editing the rejected photo may not solve it.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by AKH View Post
              The c/n is correct according to some databases.
              Category: Genre must be military and the C-130 needs category CARGO aircraft
              The others shall be fixable, as Dana said, but you shall start again from the original; editing the rejected photo may not solve it.
              ok thanks for help i will try and re-edit in the morning.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by nashwa View Post
                [/LIST]​I don't get the compression, I saved it in the highest quality, so it shouldn't be compressed in any way, I don't really understand the wrong categories, maybe it isn't information but the fact i labelled it as a hot photo, but theres no other pictures of 20-5937 on jp so it counts as hot right?
                So it was in fact NOT rejected for bad info, only categories. Since you have yet to provide a link to the rejected image I can only guess that you may not have selected Cargo.

                Comment

                Working...
                X