If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Recently I stumbled upon a Jetphoto with a tall crop of a tower (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11332513), and noticed that there are also acceptable shots of aircraft silhouette if there is a sunset/sunrise behind it (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11323804). I want to combine these two aspects into one Jetphoto. However, I am unsure what crop ratio I should use for a tower shot. Anybody knows?
Recently I stumbled upon a Jetphoto with a tall crop of a tower (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11332513), and noticed that there are also acceptable shots of aircraft silhouette if there is a sunset/sunrise behind it (https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11323804). I want to combine these two aspects into one Jetphoto. However, I am unsure what crop ratio I should use for a tower shot. Anybody knows?
Anything between 4:3 and 16:9 (or 3:4 - 9:16) is acceptable as a ratio.
Because if it's midday with clear blue sky it could be rejected for backlit.
Sorry, I can't figure out how to attach a photo here.
The sky is pinkish/purplish, with the sun set towards the bottom right of the screen (not directly behind the tower). It is quite late in the sunset.
Do you think it could be accepted?
Sorry, I can't figure out how to attach a photo here.
The sky is pinkish/purplish, with the sun set towards the bottom right of the screen (not directly behind the tower). It is quite late in the sunset.
Do you think it could be accepted?
As most of you have probably noticed, the forums have been buggy the past ~week or so, first being slow to load, and now not allowing images to be directly attached to posts. We have made the issues known to FR24, but so far they have obviously not fixed the problems.
As such, I would like to request that you refrain from
I was uploading something today and noticed that the "Jetphotos" watermark given after submitting can be moved to locations on the picture that can obstruct or alter the image in some way (for example: using the watermark to cover the rego or airline name or using it to cover an airline logo which may confuse people not familiar with aviation). Can a photo be rejected for this reason?
I have a photo on an airport overview but that day was completely overcast with little sunlight, will contrast be an issue here? and for airport overviews does the airport have to be lit with direct sunlight?
I have a photo on an airport overview but that day was completely overcast with little sunlight, will contrast be an issue here? and for airport overviews does the airport have to be lit with direct sunlight?
The attached photos were all rejected for being under-sharpened - soft, looking to see if they are worth appealing and if not, what I can do to improve in the future. Sharpening at 150, detail at 100, radius at 1.5, masking between 75-85.
Apologies to the JP.net crew for repeatedly opening new threads, sometimes I do forget and think that it was a website glitch. Will not happen again.
The attached photos were all rejected for being under-sharpened - soft, looking to see if they are worth appealing and if not, what I can do to improve in the future. Sharpening at 150, detail at 100, radius at 1.5, masking between 75-85.
Apologies to the JP.net crew for repeatedly opening new threads, sometimes I do forget and think that it was a website glitch. Will not happen again.
Will ask you one final time to please read here carefully:
Please ask for rejection advice BEFORE you appeal. We will not comment on rejections that have already been appealed.
If you cannot/will not read or follow the suggestions in the link above, any future posts will simple be ignored or deleted without comment.
Understood. I have removed the only one I appealed. The remaining 4 have not been appealed, looking for advice on what to do with them as in previous reply.
I have questions regarding masking for editing in Jetphotos (*Disclaimer: I do not endorse photo manipulation in any way, I have not manipulated any of my photos and don't plan to other than to remove dust spots, and I am seeking clarification on this topic.)
I've read the upload guidelines and see that photo manipulation is not tolerated in any way, however, the question I'm asking is if masking for Jetphotos for the purpose of enhancing contrast/the photo is allowed if not overdone? (only subtle manipulation of blacks/whites of a certain area)
*attached is an example of what I mean, the first photo is overdone, the second: masking done subtly, and the third: no masking at all.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment