Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mathijs P slide scans advise

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mathijs P slide scans advise

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2054.jpg
Views:	386
Size:	530.2 KB
ID:	1195707Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2056.png
Views:	505
Size:	153.6 KB
ID:	1195706 Hello, I have developed some old slides and the result is these photos, I was wondering if they are ok to put on the website as I’d love to show older aviation.

    Please kindly let me know,
    Mathijs P

  • #2
    Hi,
    The F-111 file/size is too small but they are both of great quality and value and it would be an honor for JP to have them in the database

    Regards
    Alex

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Alex - Spot-This ! View Post
      Hi,
      The F-111 file/size is too small but they are both of great quality and value and it would be an honor for JP to have them in the database

      Regards
      Alex
      The F-111 is too small file size?? In my computer it shows 1MB size and minimum size is 250KB correct?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Mathijs P View Post

        The F-111 is too small file size?? In my computer it shows 1MB size and minimum size is 250KB correct?
        minimum upload size is 1280 pixels, this is less than 500
        Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
        If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
        ——————————————————————————

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by TRTPUwU View Post

          minimum upload size is 1280 pixels, this is less than 500
          Ah, I picked the wrong file, sorry about this mistake

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Mathijs P View Post

            Ah, I picked the wrong file, sorry about this mistake
            It was 220 KB at upload and had a lot of JPEG compression detail loss, you might need to save it at a higher quality setting when scanning.

            Fantastic shots though
            [SIGNATURE GOES HERE]

            Felipe Garcia

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by TRTPUwU View Post

              minimum upload size is 1280 pixels, this is less than 500
              Minimum upload size is 1024px.

              1280 is the MAXIMUM for new users.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Felipe Garcia View Post

                It was 220 KB at upload and had a lot of JPEG compression detail loss, you might need to save it at a higher quality setting when scanning.

                Fantastic shots though
                Thank you for explaining this reason!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2071.jpg
Views:	223
Size:	483.3 KB
ID:	1195770
                  Hello again, would like to ask about this A4F with registration 154990 and MSN NP-302 (I believe)

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mathijs P View Post
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2071.jpg
Views:	223
Size:	483.3 KB
ID:	1195770
                    Hello again, would like to ask about this A4F with registration 154990 and MSN NP-302 (I believe)
                    Probably ok for the age, but for the future I'd turn down the amount of grain/noise removal. It's totally fine for older/scanned images to show grain. This one looks a bit overprocessed since everything is overly smooth.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by jakerepp View Post

                      Minimum upload size is 1024px.

                      1280 is the MAXIMUM for new users.
                      Oh, sorry, my bad.
                      Everything that say is in my opinion, a screener might dissagree
                      If you are dissapointed of yourself, look at me and feel better.
                      ——————————————————————————

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                        Probably ok for the age, but for the future I'd turn down the amount of grain/noise removal. It's totally fine for older/scanned images to show grain. This one looks a bit overprocessed since everything is overly smooth.
                        Thank you dlowwa, I’ll upload as is now but for the future I will take your advice

                        Comment


                        • #13


                          please may someone explain this rejection? How it is bad info and where are the artefacts

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Mathijs P View Post
                            https://www.jetphotos.com/viewqueued_b.php?id=12015731

                            please may someone explain this rejection? How it is bad info and where are the artefacts
                            This is a military aircraft, not civilian.

                            Image is somewhat compressed, but I think it's more an effect of the de-noise processing you applied.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by dlowwa View Post

                              This is a military aircraft, not civilian.

                              Image is somewhat compressed, but I think it's more an effect of the de-noise processing you applied.
                              Alright Dlowwa, thank you, I must have missed the category and will try to fix the artefacts.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X