If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hello aviators! I have yet to have a jet photo uploaded to the database, with more than a ton of rejections, I want to know what I need to improve and what is
wrong with my current edits
Thank you!
Hello sir, I’m not a screener so wait for their official response but by the looks of it your photo is under sharpened and soft. The lighting of the photo and the exposure you used would lead to a contrast rejection as well. Also make sure you try to get the entire plane in the frame, otherwise try to get most and leave a note for the screeners saying that you had creative framing. Sharpening really depends on your camera and your camera settings, how still you hold your camera, e.c.t. You should also take your photos is really good lighting, you shouldn’t need to expose your photos more that 0.20. Most people don’t even need to edit their photos at all except for framing because their photos are in perfect lighting and optimal conditions. It won’t take too much longer for your first photo it’s actually not bad. You’ll get there soon mate good luck to you in the future.
Hello aviators! I have yet to have a jet photo uploaded to the database, with more than a ton of rejections, I want to know what I need to improve and what is
wrong with my current edits
This is heavily compressed and heat hazed. Your camera might be the issue on the former - unfortunately lower quality equipment will make it more difficult to have images accepted. What are you using?
This is heavily compressed and heat hazed. Your camera might be the issue on the former - unfortunately lower quality equipment will make it more difficult to have images accepted. What are you using?
Sorry, I use the Canon EOS R50, the reason why it is heavily compressed it because I resized it to 1280x900 from its original 6000x4000 because of the length and height requirements, it looks heat hazed because I edited the temperature to a more whiter look instead of the morning yellow glow, if you would like to take a look at the original here it is but a little compressed to make the 2MB requirement (4500x3000)
Sorry, I use the Canon EOS R50, the reason why it is heavily compressed it because I resized it to 1280x900 from its original 6000x4000 because of the length and height requirements, it looks heat hazed because I edited the temperature to a more whiter look instead of the morning yellow glow, if you would like to take a look at the original here it is but a little compressed to make the 2MB requirement (4500x3000)
I'm also wondering if this close-up is ok?
I don't think you understand what heat haze is. In any case the camera should be of good enough quality if paired with a decent lens.
Thanks for posting a fuller-res image, it gives a better idea of what we're working with. Quality issues are mainly due to:
1. original is very soft, yes, partially due to heat haze
2. edit (first image posted) was very poor. someone with better skills/experience would likely produce a better result, but due to the lack of quality of the original, there's not a great chance that would be acceptable for the DB.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Tweet
Comment