Is this that bad?

[CorporateAv8r]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=270156


Looks fine to me and about 10 other people, can't believe it was rejected.

[philip]

I am not sure if it is jpg compression but look at the stripes on the fuse of the jets. They are very 'jagged' and it is not a straight line.

Also it is better to upload at 1024x*** px.

[BA747-436]

Yeah could be JPEG compression, but looks to me a tad oversharp.

[u2o]

yea looks slightly oversharpened. Look at the wing of the second aircraft (the back one), jaggy line you get when you USM too much.

[CorporateAv8r]

That makes sence, didn't understand the JPEG compression.

Thanks.

[Sulman]

You've got some cracking light there; I hope you get it in to the database.

[tsentsan]

badinfo too.

airline shld be "Private".

[CorporateAv8r]

badinfo too.

airline shld be "Private".

www.flightoptions.com

[egll]

Not sure if the badinfo is sufficient for a rejection-I thought we were still undecided on that one, although it would make sense to mark everything as 'Private' unless it says otherwise on the outside of the aircraft.



Matt

[CorporateAv8r]

Not sure if the badinfo is sufficient for a rejection-I thought we were still undecided on that one, although it would make sense to mark everything as 'Private' unless it says otherwise on the outside of the aircraft.



Matt

Well they have over 100 planes, and every pilot over here knows of them and there paint scheme, so I'd have to say it's safe to put up the name. They are the same as Netjets and FlexJets which have their own selections on the airline list.