Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Resized?? Why??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Simpleboy
    replied
    Originally posted by jwenting
    Hadn't expected anything else from people like you.
    Your "standards" are basically
    1) is the photographer a friend of mine, accept
    2) does he use a DSLR, accept
    3) reject
    Wow, now thats just stupid.

    Can you please get a life, I only know Gerado through JP.net, I dont own a DLSR, and im nearly at 500 photos here. I highly doubt that he has not ever screened one of my pics. If he went by your rules above I always thought there was an appeal function which you can use.

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    Originally posted by jwenting
    Hadn't expected anything else from people like you.
    Your "standards" are basically
    1) is the photographer a friend of mine, accept
    2) does he use a DSLR, accept
    3) reject
    I didn't expect anything else from you. In fact, I was already won dering, where you are. What you wrote is complete bullshit and you know it very well. Or do you really believe, I know ALL uploaders, whose photos I accept here? Do you really believe I only upload DSLR-pics? Typical comment from a moron, if you ask me. Get a life, Jeroen.

    Gerardo

    Leave a comment:


  • Crazy764
    replied
    Originally posted by jwenting

    Hadn't expected anything else from people like you.
    Your "standards" are basically
    1) is the photographer a friend of mine, accept
    2) does he use a DSLR, accept
    3) reject
    That's the most ridiculous bunch of bull ever.

    Before I got my 300D a couple weeks ago, I did not use a DSLR. I don't know any of the screeners (hence, not a friend). Yet, I still had photos accepted:

    [photoid=294402]
    [photoid=282216]
    [photoid=245229]

    And 106 other ones.

    Leave a comment:


  • jwenting
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343
    A good pic will not be turned into a non acceptable one . Instead of stirring up things, which don't exist, Jeroen, you should really start improving your own skills. If your pics are rejected, look just for once, what you can do about it.

    Gerardo
    Hadn't expected anything else from people like you.
    Your "standards" are basically
    1) is the photographer a friend of mine, accept
    2) does he use a DSLR, accept
    3) reject

    Leave a comment:


  • YWGJoe
    replied
    Originally posted by LX-A343
    A good pic will not be turned into a non acceptable one . Instead of stirring up things, which don't exist, Jeroen, you should really start improving your own skills. If your pics are rejected, look just for once, what you can do about it.

    Gerardo
    Bang.

    Leave a comment:


  • Crazy764
    replied
    Originally posted by Longreach747
    Matt
    you should resize to 1024x680, keeps the images nice and sharp when they are uploaded.
    Is there no reduction in quality when they are under 680 px tall?

    Leave a comment:


  • Longreach747
    replied
    Matt
    you should resize to 1024x680, keeps the images nice and sharp when they are uploaded. 1024x768 is good for one thing only, Wallpapers!

    jwenting,
    you'd be hard pressed to get business anywhere for your shots! maybe instead of running your mouth you could run to the camera shop and update your outdated equiptment!

    Leave a comment:


  • egll
    replied
    Wrong thread

    Leave a comment:


  • LX-A343
    replied
    A good pic will not be turned into a non acceptable one . Instead of stirring up things, which don't exist, Jeroen, you should really start improving your own skills. If your pics are rejected, look just for once, what you can do about it.

    Gerardo

    Leave a comment:


  • jwenting
    replied
    the upload script causes loss of quality in my shots as well, enough so that critically sharp shots come out with jagged edges and/or blurred lettering more often than not.

    Nothing you can do about it, but enough reason to take your business elsewhere.

    Leave a comment:


  • u2o
    replied
    the 'resized' image isnt really correct. i believe that the extra 9 pixels in the vertical is the black bar with your name and Jetphoto.net text. im not quite sure with loss in quality, i havent encountered that before.

    Leave a comment:


  • Matt Southwell
    started a topic Resized?? Why??

    Resized?? Why??

    Hi all,
    I am resizing all my images to 1024x768 before uploading them but when they have been accepted and on the net they appear to have been resized slightly to 1024x787
    Can someone tell me why? because when I process them they are sharp and fine at 1024x768 but once they go to 1024x787 they lose a bit of qaulity and I begin to see jaggered lines which are not there at 768.

    Regards Matt
Working...
X