Resized?? Why??

[Matt Southwell]

Hi all,
I am resizing all my images to 1024x768 before uploading them but when they have been accepted and on the net they appear to have been resized slightly to 1024x787
Can someone tell me why? because when I process them they are sharp and fine at 1024x768 but once they go to 1024x787 they lose a bit of qaulity and I begin to see jaggered lines which are not there at 768.

Regards Matt

[u2o]

the 'resized' image isnt really correct. i believe that the extra 9 pixels in the vertical is the black bar with your name and Jetphoto.net text. im not quite sure with loss in quality, i havent encountered that before.

[jwenting]

the upload script causes loss of quality in my shots as well, enough so that critically sharp shots come out with jagged edges and/or blurred lettering more often than not.

Nothing you can do about it, but enough reason to take your business elsewhere.

[LX-A343]

A good pic will not be turned into a non acceptable one . Instead of stirring up things, which don't exist, Jeroen, you should really start improving your own skills. If your pics are rejected, look just for once, what you can do about it.

Gerardo

[egll]

Wrong thread

[Longreach747]

Matt
you should resize to 1024x680, keeps the images nice and sharp when they are uploaded. 1024x768 is good for one thing only, Wallpapers!

jwenting,
you'd be hard pressed to get business anywhere for your shots! maybe instead of running your mouth you could run to the camera shop and update your outdated equiptment!

[Crazy764]

Matt
you should resize to 1024x680, keeps the images nice and sharp when they are uploaded.

Is there no reduction in quality when they are under 680 px tall?

[YWGJoe]

A good pic will not be turned into a non acceptable one . Instead of stirring up things, which don't exist, Jeroen, you should really start improving your own skills. If your pics are rejected, look just for once, what you can do about it.

Gerardo

Bang.

[jwenting]

A good pic will not be turned into a non acceptable one . Instead of stirring up things, which don't exist, Jeroen, you should really start improving your own skills. If your pics are rejected, look just for once, what you can do about it.

Gerardo

Hadn't expected anything else from people like you.
Your "standards" are basically
1) is the photographer a friend of mine, accept
2) does he use a DSLR, accept
3) reject

[Crazy764]

Hadn't expected anything else from people like you.
Your "standards" are basically
1) is the photographer a friend of mine, accept
2) does he use a DSLR, accept
3) reject

That's the most ridiculous bunch of bull ever.

Before I got my 300D a couple weeks ago, I did not use a DSLR. I don't know any of the screeners (hence, not a friend). Yet, I still had photos accepted:

[photoid=294402]
[photoid=282216]
[photoid=245229]

And 106 other ones.

[LX-A343]

Hadn't expected anything else from people like you.
Your "standards" are basically
1) is the photographer a friend of mine, accept
2) does he use a DSLR, accept
3) reject

I didn't expect anything else from you. In fact, I was already won dering, where you are. What you wrote is complete bullshit and you know it very well. Or do you really believe, I know ALL uploaders, whose photos I accept here? Do you really believe I only upload DSLR-pics? Typical comment from a moron, if you ask me. Get a life, Jeroen.

Gerardo

[Simpleboy]

Hadn't expected anything else from people like you.
Your "standards" are basically
1) is the photographer a friend of mine, accept
2) does he use a DSLR, accept
3) reject

Wow, now thats just stupid.

Can you please get a life, I only know Gerado through JP.net, I dont own a DLSR, and im nearly at 500 photos here. I highly doubt that he has not ever screened one of my pics. If he went by your rules above I always thought there was an appeal function which you can use.

[b777]

Nothing you can do about it, but enough reason to take your business elsewhere.

Ever heard of myaviation.net

[Matt Southwell]

Thanks for your help Montague, I'm a true fan of your work. 1024x680 seems to have worked great, thanks again. And thanks everyone who has helped and sorry that some people had to make an ass of themselves in here.
Before I got my 300D I had many photos accepted with a little point and shoot, yes... most of my pics are with a DSLR BUT the point is I started out with a point and shoot and still had 90% of my photos accepted.

Regards Matt

[egll]

I'm using a 10D/300D combination and generally upload at 1024x683 as they are the dimensions of the sensor (when re-sized down), they are also pretty close to the dimensions of regular film.

In any case the shape of a plane fits much better into a 1024x683 frame .




Matt