Do these photos have a chance?

[uy707]

Frankly, none of the three.
Alain

That's what I figured. Guess it's time for a better film scanner. What would be a good one to get, preferrably one with digital ice?

It's been said a million times already, but Film just eats your pocket up. Go get yourself a nice Olympus C-770 or something.. can get it for like half a grand. YOu might be some hard core film guy.. and if you are... having looked at your pictuyres.. i strongly recommend even more looking at digital. (Also nice to review your shots right at the airport... check for proper exposure, framing, etc.)

-Adam

[Spotter]

the only one I would even try is the 2nd (tho I don't know the pure quality)

[LX-A343]

Two slide scanners I can recommend are Nikon Coolscan IV and the Minolta Dual Scan.

Gerardo

[tbirdman429]

That's what I figured. Guess it's time for a better film scanner. What would be a good one to get, preferrably one with digital ice?

I wouldn't bother trying, unless you love to waste your own time.

[Crazy764]

The middle one might have a chance (after some editing)...

[tbirdman429]

Correction, the top picture was taken using Walgreens 100 film. Their film is actually made by Agfa.

[tbirdman429]

These photos were shot on Kodak Ektachrome 100 and scanned with an older Nikon Coolscan LS-10. The first one was shot from the control tower at KPIE, through tinted glass. They let us student pilots up there for a little while.




This next one was shot from the parking garage at KTPA.



This one was also at KTPA. I know it's not level, but is it worth working on?