Why arent these photos accepted?

[jetBlue320]

Hey all!

So, airliners.net accepted my pictures. MyAviation.net accepted my pictures. WHY WON'T JETPHOTOS.NET?

























Thanks!


Oh, and if the photos are not visible, heres the link to my "MyAviation.net" gallery:

[/url]http://myaviation.net/search/search.php[/code]

[Airbus_A320]

Uhh... myaviation.net doesn't have any standards... everything gets accepted there

[mikecweb]

Ok first of all jus because they accept doesn't mean Jp.net will.

1) bad motive.
2) bad motive...doesn't show us much.
3) bad motive, unlevel, poor quality, ummm theres black things in it.
4) poor quality
5) good for hair club for men but meh not here
6) mmmmm nice scratches...

[SWA733Captain]

If a.net accepted those...

[jetBlue320]

Airbus_A320 - I said MYAVIATION.NET, AND AIRLINERS.NET. (Which, by the way, has WAY BETTER standards than jp.net)

Scraches? The only visible scraches on the pictures were on the last one; and that was right on the window itself.

Everyone else that I ask (aviation photography experts, even) say that most of the pictures have great quality.

Uh...yeah, I asked for advice. Realiable advice. CAN SOMEONE PLEASE GIVE ME RELIABLE ADVICE??!!

[SWA733Captain]

Re: Why arent these photos accepted?

So, airliners.net accepted my pictures. MyAviation.net accepted my pictures. WHY WON'T JETPHOTOS.NET?

Uh...yeah, I asked for advice. Realiable advice. CAN SOMEONE PLEASE GIVE ME RELIABLE ADVICE??!!

One, that isn't asking for advice. Two, you got quite a bit of nerve to say something like that after that little episode of water works.

[airplanegeek]

standards

standards suck!

[mikecweb]

Airbus_A320 - I said MYAVIATION.NET, AND AIRLINERS.NET. (Which, by the way, has WAY BETTER standards than jp.net)

Scraches? The only visible scraches on the pictures were on the last one; and that was right on the window itself.

Everyone else that I ask (aviation photography experts, even) say that most of the pictures have great quality.

Uh...yeah, I asked for advice. Realiable advice. CAN SOMEONE PLEASE GIVE ME RELIABLE ADVICE??!!

I laid out what was wrong for each picture.....
what more do you want...link me to a photo accepted on airliners.nets main site...

[DeltaASA16]

DUde.. your a moron. I wont lie.. your pics suck. I dont care if Airliners.net accepted them, they are crap. There's nothin of interest in any of them. Picture of a bathroom? WTF are you trying to get at!? Seroiusly consider shooting something of interest next time!

[LX-A343]

Dear Giuseppe, can you please provide a link to your AIRLINERS.NET pictures? I ask, because I didn't find them, and quite frankly I don't believe, the pics you showed here are anywhere else, than on Myaviation.net, the site with NO STANDTARDS at all.

Cheers
Gerardo

[tsentsan]

This is a very good thread to demonstrate the meaning of BADMOTIVE.

Additionally, we cld also have a BADSTUBBORNPHOTOGRAPHER too

[Airbus_A320]

Airbus_A320 - I said MYAVIATION.NET, AND AIRLINERS.NET. (Which, by the way, has WAY BETTER standards than jp.net)

Uh... there is nothing of yours at airliners. The site that "accepted" those pics is myaviation.net which has NO STANDARDS.

btw... those pics do suck...

[Airbus_A320]

standards

standards suck!

Hey stop messing with my posts like that

[Matt Southwell]

I highly doubt an "Aviation Photography Expert" would say that these photos are of great quality.
Why won't jetphotos.net accept them??? 'cause there not good enough simple as that, myaviation.net will take anything. Stop complaining and go and work on improving your skills. I also doubt that airliners would accept them, not likely at all.
People want to see photos of airplanes not bathroom sinks.

You WERE given reliable advice, so there's no need to type with caps pal.

Regards Matt

[Crazy764]

Where'd the author go??

All the photos have a MyAviation.Net URL...none of them are on A.net.