Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rejection help...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rejection help...

    how can they call this Overexposed ? I just was really happy with the contrast and colours at this spot. and than you got it rejected for overexposeure ? i'm going to apeal this one but what do you think about this shot ? maybe a screener who can tell me whats wrong?


    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=361076
    My English sucks... so does my Dutch... please help me out :P
    Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net!

  • #2
    Look OK to my (newbie) eyes. The white appears a little "white" .. if you know what I mean. But apart from that, nice shot.

    Comment


    • #3
      Since it's not a white-body plane, the overexposure is not obvious at all. Nice photo, IMO.
      Will F.
      Photos: JetPhotos.Net | Airliners.net | General Photography

      Comment


      • #4
        The tail is indeed bit white but still good enough to be uploaded but I still dont have the Email with the Link for apeal I hope its going to be accepted because this is my best 777 shot so far Still no screener here that might know why its been rejected ?
        My English sucks... so does my Dutch... please help me out :P
        Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net!

        Comment


        • #5
          looks too bright to me.
          On the borderline I reckon, guess the screener chose to reject it.
          Looks slightly overexposed, too bright. Workable in Photoshop to bring it down, just play around with it. Wld have gone the same way as the screener if I screened it.

          Anyway if you dont agree, appeal

          Comment


          • #6
            http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=338561

            this one looks quite the same The color of the777 just makes it just a bright colorfull picture I asked some friends and they said the same..

            but the Mail with the apeal link I still did not recieve...
            My English sucks... so does my Dutch... please help me out :P
            Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net!

            Comment


            • #7
              [photoid=338558]
              Will F.
              Photos: JetPhotos.Net | Airliners.net | General Photography

              Comment


              • #8
                Thnx, Crazy764 everytime I Forget how to do it

                Here is another example the exposure is quite the same...

                http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=339896
                My English sucks... so does my Dutch... please help me out :P
                Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net!

                Comment


                • #9
                  [photoid=xxxxx]

                  How are you liking that 300D?
                  Will F.
                  Photos: JetPhotos.Net | Airliners.net | General Photography

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Crazy764
                    [photoid=xxxxx]

                    How are you liking that 300D?
                    Its great! september october I will purchase a new lens proberly a 75-300mm from canon
                    My English sucks... so does my Dutch... please help me out :P
                    Click Here to view my aircraft photos at JetPhotos.Net!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Appeal it. Definitely not overexposed (at least not enough to warrant a rejection IMO).
                      ________
                      SILVER SURFER REVIEW

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Perhaps the screener should turn their brightness setting down a bit on their monitor.

                        Or stop trying to purposely increase their rejection rate...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Legend_Airlines
                          Perhaps the screener should turn their brightness setting down a bit on their monitor.

                          Or stop trying to purposely increase their rejection rate...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Hey, I thought I was the king of sarcasm until I met you and JeffinDEN

                            Really though, I think it's a fairly lame reason for rejection.

                            Keep taking those pics Ruben

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Legend_Airlines
                              Perhaps the screener should turn their brightness setting down a bit on their monitor.

                              Or stop trying to purposely increase their rejection rate...

                              I'll do a compromise ok?

                              I'll accept more low quality shots, whilst rejecting everything from you ok? Fair? Good.


                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X