Y
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Some rejects
Collapse
X
-
Re: Some rejects
Just my opinion here:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=402116
Overexposed & digitally manipulated?
In my opinon this is a good picture.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=402124
Bad motive? Why? I like those wing views
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=402127
Ok maybe a little soft, but overexposed?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=402131
Overexposed? Ok it is almost a white plane so it looks like a litte bit overexposed.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=402120
Bad quality? Photo was taken in the last sun rays of the day.
Hope this helps
Gerardo
Comment
-
Slides are still the best way to learn photography. You learn correct exposure the hard way. Once overexposed, there's no correction possible anymore
Digital cameras have the advantage of a wider dynamic range. I'd say, these pics above could have probably been better, if taken with a digicam. On the other hand, re-scanning those slides and starting from scratch could give you better results, now that you know, what to look at.
Anyway, let's show your digipics in November
Gerardo
Comment
-
Re: Some rejects
Originally posted by thunderchiefYou're thoughts on these rejects:
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Overexposed & digitally manipulated?
In my opinon this is a good picture.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Bad motive? Why? I like those wing views
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Ok maybe a little soft, but overexposed?
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Overexposed? Ok it is almost a white plane so it looks like a litte bit overexposed.
JetPhotos.com is the biggest database of aviation photographs with over 5 million screened photos online!
Bad quality? Photo was taken in the last sun rays of the day.
#1: I'd say slightly over-exposed but not enough to "ruin" the photo. There does seem to be a funny "halo" around the aircraft though ...
#2: I'd appeal. I like the motive and the photo.
#3: Again "slightly" overexposed. Next time try step down 1/3 eV to correct this. And I agree it could use an extra zap of USM
#4: Definitely overexposed, as it looks pretty washed-out. Do the same as in #3 next time to correct this (or use a faster shutter speed). Be careful with the noise reduction on this one as well ... the mountain in the background looks like it was over Neat(image)-ified
#5: There's that funny halo again (around the tail area). Looks a bit noisy as well.
All in all, some really nice pics and with a few tweaks to your settings the next time at the 'port, you'll have the quality the site is after.
________
MERCEDES-BENZ CLC-CLASS SPECIFICATIONS
Comment
-
Andries, just out of curiosity: what camera are you using? what film and settings? (My old days of slide-shooting are calling me )
Gerardo
Comment
-
Originally posted by thunderchiefI will take the step to digital in November when the new Minolta Dynax 7 Digital is released, but from that point I will still continue to take shots on my 'old' Dynax 5 or even older Dynax 5000i camera. So that have both digital and slides.
But, I still have my older EOS 30 and EOS RT and the more I see them, the more I want to take some slides again. I'll give it a try, when I make my next batch of ramp shots.
Gerardo
Comment
Comment