Not satisfied with screener decision

[phtr88]

Today i got this rejection:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=822863

i appealed and wrote some lines into the boxe but it was not accepted again.
reason for rejection is a objective one. i canīt see that this one has a bad saturation - it looks nice to me.
i rather like this pic because itīs even the first good night shot taken by me therefore i canīt understand the screener.
after that i edited it again in photoshop and uploaded it:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=825463

what do you think? for me itīs one of the best pics during the last year...

cheers,
philipp

[YYZPICS]

I think the snow played a part in the bad colour rejection, I would say it reflected to much light.

[phtr88]

I think the snow played a part in the bad colour rejection, I would say it reflected to much light.

but the shape of the snow, in the pic below the plane makes this pic becoming to a nice winter pic.

[RingwaySam]

Appeal then...

[chrisburns]

Its too yellow, the snow and type of light didn't make for a good pic.

[LX-A343]

Philipp, there's nothing easier than to correct the color on this rejected pic. SImply play around with the white point and look what happens.

Gerardo

[phtr88]

hi guys,

due to the comments i played a little bit with adobe with the following result:

http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/5173/dbgalfrjc944mv.jpg

what do you think?

and another question. i also got recently this rejection:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=822235

but another version of the motive was edited by me again with this result:

http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/6739/sugatab6fx10nx.jpg

is this one acceptable?

thanks alot for your help

philipp

[tsentsan]

RE the Egypt Air Airbus, very difficult conditions. On one hand, the tail is way too overexposed while the nose is very dark. I know the lighting for night shots is not always optimal, but I guess this could be one for the personal collection.

[phtr88]

i frustrate now... the improved image of the 328 was rejceted again. and iīve no clue how i can make this shot better for the screeners?
first of all i didnīt know what white point was and after that my re-edited pic was rejected again.... i want to have this one online because itīs one of my favourite shots last year. iīd be very sad if this one wonīt be taken...

so could anybody edit this pic for me?

http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/...atab6fx10nx.jpg

thanks alot,

philipp

[RingwaySam]

Philipp you need to take some of the colour out of the shot because it's far to orange. Heres my quick attempt -



Hope this helps

[phtr88]

this one isnīt good, is it?

http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/3312/dbgalfrjc957oh.jpg

damm, thatīs rather difficult to make this shot acceptable...

[RingwaySam]

this one isnīt good, is it?

http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/3...lfrjc957oh.jpg

damm, thatīs rather difficult to make this shot acceptable...

Send me the original if you want...

[phtr88]

whatīs about this one

http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/7928/dbgalfrjc969jy.jpg

[RingwaySam]

whatīs about this one
http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/792...lfrjc969jy.jpg

Philipp, Heres my quick go with the original -



http://img402.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cirrus9vc.jpg

Hope it helps!

[phtr88]

Philipp, Heres my quick go with the original -



http://img402.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cirrus9vc.jpg

Hope it helps!

thanks sam for your post. i suppose you edited the pic by the description you gave me before, so with hue/saturation...?
could you tell me where (to which number) approximately you have moved regulator of the saturation tab to remove the orangey effect

philipp