I don't understand this and am now feeling a little annoyed and frustrated....this shot was rejected, reason; digitaly manipulated....what??
>> http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=855278
So I appeal, stating that I have done nothing different with this shot than I normaly do. ie; levels,curves, re-size, sharpen.
Appeal rejected with the statement; overuse of noise reduction program such as neat image. This reminded me that in an effort to reduce noise in my shots, and as a result of taking advice from these forums, their IS something else I have done differently, that being to turn off all in camera sharpening, and do all sharpening in PS. The shots I have taken on this same day. 28th Feb, are all shot and proscessed in the same way and PS settings!
Am I taking this the wrong way, missing something? I have not used any type of program, nor would I wish or know how to....should I go back to a little in camera sharpening??
I would appreciate your input/help here, folks/screeners.....
thanks, Paul
>> http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject.php?id=855278
So I appeal, stating that I have done nothing different with this shot than I normaly do. ie; levels,curves, re-size, sharpen.
Appeal rejected with the statement; overuse of noise reduction program such as neat image. This reminded me that in an effort to reduce noise in my shots, and as a result of taking advice from these forums, their IS something else I have done differently, that being to turn off all in camera sharpening, and do all sharpening in PS. The shots I have taken on this same day. 28th Feb, are all shot and proscessed in the same way and PS settings!
Am I taking this the wrong way, missing something? I have not used any type of program, nor would I wish or know how to....should I go back to a little in camera sharpening??
I would appreciate your input/help here, folks/screeners.....
thanks, Paul
Comment