Do you need any Pre-Screening? - Limited to CREW reply ONLY.

[tomas_cubero]

light poles are a bad reference. Use buildings.

Couldn't agree with you more, but I've been told the complete opposite by some screeners when appealing some times, I'll give them another try.

Also got a couple more I need help with:

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=1786094 - Is it too dark? I am afraid a brightness increase will make grain visible.

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=1785854 - This one does look a bit backlit but would a brightness/curves adjustment make it look better for acceptance?

Thanks for the help!
Tomas.

[Brenden S]

The 1st one looks like it will be hard to brighten it up properly.
The 2nd one forget it as its backlit.

[brianw999]

No.1. You're correct, the increase in grain will kill it.

No.2. Backlit for sure.

Sorry.

[tomas_cubero]

Thanks for the help again guys,

Tomas.

[Wyland]

My first picture I uploaded was rejected. So I'll ask here what shall I do with this picture here. I'm using Paint Shop Pro since today but I don't really work on my pictures normaly. I worked a bit at this pic. Do you have any tip for me what I can do better?

[Greg]

My first picture I uploaded was rejected. So I'll ask here what shall I do with this picture here. I'm using Paint Shop Pro since today but I don't really work on my pictures normaly. I worked a bit at this pic. Do you have any tip for me what I can do better?

The major problem with the picture is that it is backlit which no amount of editing can fix. Just try shooting at a different time of day.

[Wyland]

Well thats the Problem with the AFB Payerne (SUI).


We were not erloubt to take pic's from the other side of the base so thanks for your answer

[djkraan]

747 and 330 prescan

Hi there,

Please prescan the following two pictures. These were schoot at bright sunny day with a 15mm fisheye lens. I want to be sure that I don't have "contrast" issues. Photo's are only resized and a little sharper.

Thanks for feedback,

1.




2.

[BA747-436]

You know what? Its a dam shame about the fence obstructing the shot. Otherwise you'd have some neat photos right there. Sadly as they stand they will be rejected for obstructing clutter.

[djkraan]

Strange why is this shot accepted?

Let's take a very long stick with me next time to mount my camera. Imaging the people on board of the aircraft

[BA747-436]

Mainly because the viewpoint on the EZY shot is higher than those from where you have shot. The Suriname is probably the worst as you can#t even see the gear. The KLM shot isn't as bad but the obstructing is still very much obvious due to your viewpoint being pretty low and the angle shot at im afraid.

[djkraan]

I will remove the Surinam from the que. Thanks for the feedback.

[djkraan]

Rebound

Ok B747-346, I climbed a little bit higher in the tree. Main gear is now visible. Does it make a change?

Next time I am going to rent a helicopter

[BA747-436]

For future reference my name is Dan, and oddly enough not BA747-436 lol.

Yes the KE is acceptable as no part is being obstructed.

[djkraan]

Dan, thanks for feedback. Keep up the good work