Do you need any Pre-Screening? - Limited to CREW reply ONLY.

[davalos08]

Seahawk

Thanks for your reply. I will work on the Sabreliner overexposed problem. About the Chinook, I took the picture with the sun directly at my back.

Does the image has another problem?

Thanks DAVID

[davalos08]

Hello, this image was overexposed and a little unlevel

http://img227.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fae1ga9.jpg

this is the new version please comment and tell me if is good now

http://img220.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fae1aa4.jpg

Thanks
DAVID

[pdeboer]

David, the angle didn't change, so again unleveled, it needs some ccw rotation as everything leans to the right. You did change the contrast, but it is still overexposed, part are washed out.

cheers, Pamela

[wunaladreamin]

Thanks tons Stefan!

[davalos08]

Pamela, thanks for your reply, I'll work on that image again and post another reply soon with the new version. Can you please take a look at my chinook picture, the first reply I got ask me if is backlit, I dont think so, but can you take a look please and tell me what you think so I can have two opinions.

Thanks
DAVID

[davalos08]

Dear Screeners,

This new image (http://img48.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fae2jj1.jpg) is the new version of this image (http://img220.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fae1aa4.jpg) that was overexposed and unlevel. Please comment on the new ones and tell me if its ok now and if its ok to put in the queu.

Thanks
DAVID

[magic48]

Hello David,

Your new version is still slightly overexposed and it also lacks contrast. In case you're using photoshop, try to work with the curves function here...

[ryan]

Prescreen

Motive wise would this Uzbekistan 757 make it in?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2159389

I cropped the photo like that so I could get both the plane and the terminal in the background in the pic.

[davalos08]

Gianluca, thanks for your reply, I'll work on it again and post a new one as soon as Im done

DAVID

[davalos08]

Dear screeners,

This is another version of this photo (http://img48.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fae2jj1.jpg) that was still overexposed and lacking contrast. Here is the new version (http://img221.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fae3lg7.jpg) hopefully those problems are gone, please let me know if its fine for upload, thanks a lot.

DAVID

[seahawk]

Motive wise would this Uzbekistan 757 make it in?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2159389

I cropped the photo like that so I could get both the plane and the terminal in the background in the pic.

I would crop closer. There is too much empty space front and back.

[arjenp]

Dear screeners,

Can one of you have a look on my 2 KLM's and United that i post earlier(page 130)?

Thanks
Arjen

[Alex - Spot-This !]

Arjen,

your 2 KLM shots look sharp enough. Maybe the United one deserves a liitle bit more.
But I would recommend to light up a bit those 3 shots as they really look dark to me

cheers
Alex

[wrxflyer]

At the moment I have this Delta 767 in the queue.

On this monitor it looks quite nice, but on another screen at work, it has a slight oversharpened look

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2160022

Can anyone of the screeners shine a light on it?

Thanks

Freek

[magic48]

Freek,

The titles and the wing do seem oversharp. Lots of jaggies are visible.

Maybe select the sky out when applying USM, so that the noise in the sky becomes less apparent.