Tweet
Originally posted by Jan-Jasinski
View Post
-
No, they're still not acceptable and never will be because the originals need to be better, so just ditch them and move on. Why do you persist with these images rather than taking advice and just trying to shoot in better conditions? Can't you see it's wasting your own time and ours? -
-
Jan,
I'm not known to be the most politicly correct guy and I think this Transaero picture has been enough commented so let's be clear...
You really got to learn, practice, learn way more because again, this shot is miles from being acceptable... Just look at the noise to start with... If you shoot at iso800 during the day, it's obvious that you really need to read your manual more carefully....
So PLEASE try to avoid the most basic mistakes, shoot at F8 and on good weather and when you'll have mastered the basics you can start to try shooting outside the box...
regards
AlexComment
-
Well said too, thanks.Originally posted by Omar Alex Saffe View Post
If I DO go spotting in bad weather another time (will try to avoid) at the same time I shall try to stick with f/8Comment
-
Hi.
Okay, largest aircraft to land at Wellington in over 10 years. Longest ever too.
Anyway, got these photos.
They wouldn't be considered hot would they (just wanted to double check first in case I could...) as it's the first 777-300 that air nz has and a new rego (though it's a tad old got here 1 month ago).... It may just be the excitement of this new aircraft.
From Aviation Photos
From Aviation Photos
Just wondering about these photos...
Cheers!Note: I did not copy PMN, I am in fact obsessed with both (ask anyone who knows me and they would confirm that I talk constantly about these things
Comment
-
Not hot, as we have already photos of Air NZ B773 in the db taken over a month ago. Also, they look both a bit backlit.Comment
-
Yeah. I got all excited about it being hot in my mind (cause it was a pretty big deal for Wellington aviation if I'm honest) but realised afterwards that it was a far stretch
As i'm still nowhere near being a proficient uploader, is there a suitable way to fix this backlighting?
Compared to other situations, i feel that they may be salvageable?
ThanksNote: I did not copy PMN, I am in fact obsessed with both (ask anyone who knows me and they would confirm that I talk constantly about these things
Comment
-
How's to level this shot?
Hi,
Can your guys tell me how's to level this shot?
rgds,
I love JP.net
Comment
-
Kanehoshi...
With no reliable vertical and a wide angle shot this is one of those where you have use a horizontal. Trouble is....there's no reliable horizontal !!
Visualise the horizon as an average that looks right and run the level tool along that (red horizontal line in this example). In this case it comes out as 2.02 degrees clockwise.Visually check the result. The main point of eye focus is the photographer. He needs to be seeming to stand vertically which he is with this adjustment.
If it 'ain't broken........ Don't try to mend it !
Comment
-
How are these in general? My main concern is sharpness, since I just got a bunch of rejections due to softness
1-IMG_1305_1024_N154AW
1-IMG_1307_1024_N313AW
1-IMG_1390_1024_N155AW[SIGNATURE GOES HERE]
Felipe GarciaComment
-
They look very well to me, though last one could not be harmed with a little bit of extra sharpening, so you might want it to give a bit extra before uploadingOriginally posted by Felipe Garcia View Post
cheers, PamelaComment
-
Thanks![SIGNATURE GOES HERE]
Felipe GarciaComment
-
Hello,
may you please tell me whether these pictures are OK?
Thank you
LasseComment
-
My main concerns are the two CRJ-900s (is that kind of shot ok? or is that an automatic a bad framing rejection? and QAC, since it was shot a bit far away (for its size)Last edited by Felipe Garcia; 2011-02-13, 04:29.[SIGNATURE GOES HERE]
Felipe GarciaComment
Comment