Do you need any Pre-Screening? - Limited to CREW reply ONLY.

[Electric-Jet]

these any good

[LX-A343]

Nr 1 looks a tad noisy and shows a bit of a halo around th aircraft

Nr 2 is too noisy in my opinion.

Gerardo

[Manc]

A few pics I'm being self critical here, if I'm wrong and its OK let me know!

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=886718 level??
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=886864 blurry, quality I'm not sure just liked the smoke!?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=886888 i think its a goodun
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=886891 blurred?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=886894 lacks quality/grainy?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=886901

cheers Ian

[philip]

#1: yep, needs a ccw rotation. Make sure the buildings in the back are vertical!
#2: yeah, looks like it was a bit blurry and you tried to compensate it by sharpening - not bad, I'd accept it.
#3: you are right but a slight ccw rotation wouldn't hurt.
#4: yep blurred, especially nose and tail
#5: no, but it is oversharpened - watch the jaggies around the flaps.
#6: same as #2 but more jagged

nice shots, especially Singapore and Finnair - these will make the cut easily after leveling!

[Manc]

thanks Philip, I'll keep the bizjet in then, I've deleted the sas and sky service.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=887801 finnair with ccw
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=887808 sq with ccw
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=887842 new sky pic
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=887851 new coa pic

I've left the Fin and SQ in the original thread to compare, I'll delete after comments.

[BA747-436]

Finnair - Nice but could use a tad more contrast and looks as though it has been alittle oversharpend

Singapore - Cant quite tell, but on initial comment id say possibly abit more CCW. If im being picky its a tad over exposed on certain areas also.

SkyEurope - Alittle oversharp for my taste

Continental - Needs more contrast. Also looks a bit bright...

[Manc]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=888143 another crack at the COA, hopefully better contrast with this one.


I'll mess around with the others later. cheers for the help Dan.

[E-Diddy!]

The fuselage looks overexposed and the pic generally lacks saturation.

While I'm in the thread, yesterday while I was hiking I caught this Mad Dog pulling a nice vortice trail.

[seahawk]

The 777, is borderline to overexposed on the fuselage. Looking at the regi it might have seen a bit too hard sharpening.

Apart from that is looks a bit dull to me. Could use some saturation. And perhaps some works with the curves. A nice Curve that reduces the highlights and brings out the dark and medium areas would help.

@ E-Diddy

You are not going to upload the MD - do you ?

[BA747-436]

Seriously guys, could you RE-READ the opening post on this thread. Id really rather not ask for a THIRD time.

[MaxPower]

Seriously guys, could you RE-READ the opening post on this thread. Id really rather not ask for a THIRD time.

I was thinking that too, I was just about to note him about this, but I decided to not to since I pretty much expected the thread starter would show up and mention the reason why this (Pre-screen By Screeners) is here in the first place.

Just my half of a centavos

[BHX]

I have this shot of a BA 146 that got rejected for 'bad info' earlier this week.
The problem is that the airline (Or rather, Franchise has changed) to BA Connect since the 1st February 2006.
Would this be necessary to change it to that or still keep it as 'British Airways'?

Many thanks in advance

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued.php?id=887554

[BA747-436]

Jonathan, may i refer you to this thread by one of our Admins, AJ:

http://www.jetphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=31454

Im guessing that your previous upload was under "British Airways"? - If so this would explain the bad info rejection as we are now using the "BA Connect" airline ID. Your shot in the queue should be fine, hope this helps

[BHX]

Thanks Dan
You are one top bloke i tell ya!

[BA747-436]

Not a problem. Im off to Australia tommorow for a couple of weeks so i wont be able to help much in this thread, but im sure the rest of the crew will be more than helpful